VICKERS MK6B's resto

[Mike Cecil]

Thanks Colin, I appreciate you putting up those images.

Regards

Mike

[colin jones]

I need some more 5/16 rivets for my floor and I only have a lot of 3/8 but I found a place in Australia that have them and they're only about 25cents each so I have ordered some. In the mean time I thought I better get on with refurbishing the wheel stations and what a job that has been.
These must have been on there for decades as it has taken me 3 days to get them off with the help of lubricant, porta power, Jack hammer, Swearing, sledge hammer. Without the portapower, there is no way I would have got them off.

[colin jones]

There is a combination of English wheels and Australian wheels on there. It is quite rewarding when the last one comes off and a big sigh of relief. In case you were thinking that the Porta Power was just sitting on the end of the axle, I machined up a solid spacer that held in position so it wasn't dangerous.

[Lynn Eades]

For those that don't know, The Australian Carriers and the Vickers light tank (MkVIb) had wider wheels than British and Canadian carriers.
The Wheels Colin refers to as British, are of the same style as a std. U.C. wheel, but are wider. They are the original VLT MkVIb wheels.
The track has the wider spaced horns and Australia adopted this track for its LP2 and LP2A series of carriers. (in doing so, it changed the spoke style of the wheels) This move (wider wheels/ track horns) apparently made the Australian carrier, less likely to throw its track.

[David Dunlop]

Wow, Colin, that is an entire project in its own right. There probably isn't a single movable fitting there that has actually done so in a VERY long time.

Interesting about the wheels and tracks being similar to the Australian Pattern Carrier. A couple of the suspension spring sets look a bit suspect. Do you know if they were shared with the APC as well? That could make things a bit simpler as you move deeper into this part of the restoration.

Hope the weather was cooler for you over those three days.


David

[Mike Cecil]

Lynn,

Good point regarding the effect (ie less likely to throw tracks) of the design changes, however the reasons for the variations in design from the British MG/Bren carrier were not in regard to improvements in performance but "...firstly to standardise certain parts with similar parts on the light tank [Vickers Mk6A] and secondly to suit Australian production methods. The War Office was not advised before the variations were taken in hand." (Dept of the Army Memo to Secretary Military Board, 22-10-1941).

These variations caused some considerable problems, particularly in the ME when units were handed both Brit and Aust built carriers, and the spares situation for the Aust carriers did not keep pace with the usage. Result: grounded Aust carriers where available Brit spares could not be fitted.

Mike

[Lynn Eades]

Mike, thanks for the info. my conclusions are based on what I have seen on the ground, and the odd old photo. My knowledge of actual history and details is somewhat lacking.
I made the incorrect assumption that the wider track/ wheels arrived with the MkVIB, but were obviously already in place with the MkVIA
There is a photo of new track going on A VLT in the desert and this is where I drew my conclusion that Australia had taken up Vickers track improvement when designing the LP2. If you know the photo, are you able to date it?
I assume these VLTs came from the Vickers factory already fitted with this wider wheel, design of track in the late 30s, when Australia first bought them?
With the longer track of the VLT, I see the potential for throwing track and I imagine the VLT would have had big issues with that problem, had it not gone to the wider rubber.
I note that in the same vein, the Loyd carriers had added cleats to its sprockets. (I am not sure if this was more about reducing the wear rate or to help "stabilise" the track?)
The Canadians later changed the design of the sprocket on its U.Cs. for similar reasons.
Again, thanks for the clarification.