MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Restoration Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-03-16, 01:31
Jacques Reed Jacques Reed is offline
VMVC
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 867
Default Another knuckle part number

Now I am confused (More so than normal!)

While putting away the knuckles I photographed for the earlier post I noticed the Part number C01Q 3358 cast into one of the knuckles as per the photo attached. None of the other two knuckles had any numbers cast into them.

Very different to the F15A parts list numbers I quoted.

It definitely came off a 4-7/8" steering end as used on the F15A. Still, as is often the case, it does not mean it is the correct one.

I don't have a parts list for the larger trucks with 6" steering ends and would have thought those knuckles would not be the same size but could it be?

Anyone able to shed some light on this one?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0143.jpg (60.1 KB, 1 views)
__________________
F15-A 1942 Battery Staff

Jacques Reed
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-03-16, 18:36
Dave Schindel Dave Schindel is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: S.E. Sask. Canada
Posts: 283
Default

Tough one.....none of my knuckles have numbers,at least none that I could find.Just the Ford logo stamped on the inside near the bearing race.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-03-16, 18:42
Dave Schindel Dave Schindel is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: S.E. Sask. Canada
Posts: 283
Default

Rob, I am guessing that the 1/2 in. studs were used where the steering arm attaches to the knuckle and the others were 7/16. Later they were all tapped to 1/2?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-03-16, 18:57
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,617
Default

It would make sense, in the interest of carrying less spare parts in the supply system, to make the left and right the same. So to that end, you would have to go with 1/2 inch, since that was required to handle the load of turning 2 wheels. The left side only had to handle the load of turning one, so in that case 7/16 studs would have sufficed engineering wise.

Checked a 44 Chev 15cwt Sigs van that is apart and sitting about 30' from me. Sure enough, 1/2" threaded holes on the left side and the C01Q-3348 part number on the casting.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-03-16, 01:17
Jacques Reed Jacques Reed is offline
VMVC
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 867
Default Ford and Chev parts numbers

Hi Rob,

After reading about your part C01Q-3348 on A Chev CMP and my C01Q-3358 off a Ford CMP perhaps Ford assigned different numbers to parts earmarked for Chev truck production? Can anyone shed any light on that as I don't have any Chev Parts manual to check.

Have looked in my GM MB-C1 Maintenances Manual but no reference there to part numbers in the front axle section. GM seems to avoid part number in their Maintenance Manual whereas Ford seems to often quote them.

Cheers,
__________________
F15-A 1942 Battery Staff

Jacques Reed
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-03-16, 03:38
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,617
Default

Sorry about the part number...I'll have to confirm tomorrow. It is likely the 3358 number you quoted and I hit one digit off.

It would seem as though Ford was the primary designer/supplier of the knuckles, brakes and hubs for the bulk of the Ford and Chevrolet CMPs. You will often find Ford's name on bearings, and Ford part numbers on castings.

There was a great deal of co-operation between the two during the design phase, as is documented in Blueprint for Victory by Bill Gregg. Some of it went the other way too. The Lynx armoured car had Chev brake system on one of the axles.

Remember that when it came to brake systems, companies like Bendix would provide the various models of braking systems, and companies like Marmon-Harrington would provide the various 4 wheel drive systems, Timken the axle systems, so there would have been some commonality just from the limited number of providers of engineering back then.

Often the Chevrolet parts manuals listed the FOrd part number as the primary part number, then after the description in parenthesis, would give the Chevrolet part number.

I am no fan of the chevys, so have to say that by putting Ford parts on a Chevy, you can only make things better.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-03-16, 02:32
Bob Phillips Bob Phillips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 450
Default Ford vs Chev

Now Rob..lets not get carried away..
While I accept that each of us has his own peculiar tastes..and that there is a strong, committed and even delusional body of enthusiasts who collect Fords ...the unkind slight you have dished out..by suggesting that a Chev is improved by bolting on Ford parts is simply hitting below the belt.
One of my earliest CMP vehicles was a Ford gun tractor. It was the most difficult, tempermental and unreliable vehicle I ever owned. To get it running with sporadically stuck valves, a fuel system that vapor locked routinely and a front mounted distributor clearly designed by someone with a bent and twisted sense of humour strained even my patience.
There can be no more reliable a powerplant than the 216/235 series of engines. I have owned MANY since the Ford days and (aside from a equally tempermental UC) have never returned to the dark side !! B.P.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wanted: F60 steering box Corey Myronuk For Sale Or Wanted 1 15-05-12 06:45
CMP FAT steering box Tony B The Restoration Forum 12 03-06-10 00:08
Ford F15a steering wheel Tim Berry The Restoration Forum 0 12-12-06 08:38
Steering a UC BIG MIKE The Carrier Forum 11 20-02-06 18:31
UC steering box rob love The Carrier Forum 3 29-12-04 04:38


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 22:11.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016