MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21-02-16, 16:45
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,372
Default

Image: Quad from a refugee ship: the register labels it as such, ie 'refugee', and it has been allotted an AMF number within the block allotted to refugee cargo, as per the instruction. But instead of using his initiative and common sense, the staff in the OVP didn't obliterate the Brit number because the instruction didn't specifically instruct him to do so. So now it has two: one useful, one useless within the Australian system.

Since neither of us really know just how the staff at the time interpreted the instruction, it will remain a mystery!

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-02-16, 21:52
Tony Wheeler's Avatar
Tony Wheeler Tony Wheeler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yarra Junction VIC
Posts: 953
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Cecil View Post
But instead of using his initiative and common sense, the staff in the OVP didn't obliterate the Brit number because the instruction didn't specifically instruct him to do so.
Like I said Mike - that's way above his pay grade! Mind you, in fairness to staff they did face a conundrum under MECH 314. That is, Cab 12 FATs bearing WO numbers technically fell under BOTH headings, and were subject to BOTH instructions, because they were "types which have not previously operated by AIF Units". It's possible therefore that Cab 12 FATs arriving in Stepsister movement were allocated 50201-51000 numbers, bringing "refugee" entry into the ledger, and in the case above, someone had a bob each way!

Of course, we're assuming OVP had access to full shipping information, which may not have been the case during this chaotic period.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Cecil View Post
Since neither of us really know just how the staff at the time interpreted the instruction, it will remain a mystery!
Exactly - we're trying to second guess staff who themselves were trying to second guess instructions in the middle of a war almost 75 years ago!

I notice Australian Armour and Artillery Museum have ARN 46425, which suggests another "Refugee" block was opened. Do we have any record of this one Mike?

Ford Cab 12 FAT ARN 46425 Australian Armour and Artillery Museum formerly Sid Beck Mareeba.jpg
__________________
One of the original Australian CMP hunters.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-02-16, 03:50
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,372
Default

Actually, Tony, I don't believe you can 'mix and match' the individual requirements as listed under each heading - I think each stands alone - which leads me to conclude that therein is the basis of the difference between how we each see MECH314, but that's just me.

46425 is an easy one: the front shell is off a 3 ton 4x4 GS cab 12, chassis/engine number 2G44509F, part of UK Order 889. It is ex-The Beck collection (where I think the image was taken), now residing at the Cairns A&A Museum. Syd was always keen to add the missing bits when he could.

Mike

Last edited by Mike Cecil; 23-02-16 at 03:58.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-02-16, 07:35
Keith Webb's Avatar
Keith Webb Keith Webb is offline
Film maker, CMP addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: HIGHTON VIC
Posts: 8,218
Default 46425

Not only was it a cab 12 front from a F60L, the whole lot was sitting on a cab 13 F15A chassis. You can see the centre mount for the cab 13 front shell.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Cecil View Post
46425 is an easy one: the front shell is off a 3 ton 4x4 GS cab 12, chassis/engine number 2G44509F, part of UK Order 889. It is ex-The Beck collection (where I think the image was taken), now residing at the Cairns A&A Museum. Syd was always keen to add the missing bits when he could.
__________________
Film maker

42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains
42 FGT No9 (Aust)
42 F15
Keith Webb
Macleod, Victoria Australia
Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-02-16, 18:24
Tony Wheeler's Avatar
Tony Wheeler Tony Wheeler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yarra Junction VIC
Posts: 953
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Cecil View Post
Actually, Tony, I don't believe you can 'mix and match' the individual requirements as listed under each heading - I think each stands alone
Certainly that's the literal interpretation Mike, which I believe would apply in 99% of cases. However, in the case of Cab 12 FAT, it would lead to some vehicles getting around with WO numbers (Stepsister ship arrivals) and others with 50210-51000 numbers (refugee ship arrivals). Rightly or wrongly I don't believe that was the intention at the time, so I've deliberately circumvented MECH 314 ("mix and match" interpretation) to achieve the required outcome.

What I'm suggesting here is that MECH 314 was policy on the run which did not cover all possibilities, and hence needs to be applied judiciously in certain cases. This requires an understanding of policy intentions at the time, in which OVP staff would have been instructed, but which we ourselves can only deduce from surviving evidence.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Cecil View Post
which leads me to conclude that therein is the basis of the difference between how we each see MECH314
Yes, but the difference exists only in relation to Cab 12 FAT, because I see it as an anomaly which was not anticipated when MECH 314 was drafted. That is, a vehicle type brought back by AIF which had never actually been operated by AIF.

Ultimately it all comes back to our understanding of 50210-51000 block and "Refugee" entry in the ledger. I think we need to challenge our assumptions here. It's my strong suspicion that the word "Refugee" in this context may not mean what we think it means, but is more of a beaureacratic label. I believe it's worth exploring because it may open the possibility of AWM FAT being ex-Stepsister movement, which is far more significant provenance than mere "refugee cargo".

Of course, it's also possible I'm barking up the wrong tree completely!
__________________
One of the original Australian CMP hunters.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-02-16, 13:33
Tony Wheeler's Avatar
Tony Wheeler Tony Wheeler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yarra Junction VIC
Posts: 953
Default

Mike, I wonder if we can track these Cab 12 FATs trans-shipped at Colombo en route to Australia. Photo undated but presence of Andes indicates late February after Orcades returned from Java debacle (Andes embarked Suez 18 February carrying advance party 2/11 Field Regiment; disembarked Adelaide 16 March). Orcades disembarked Adelaide 14 March. If WO number H4522081 can be traced in vehicle records it may shed light on how these vehicles were eventually processed under MECH 314.

030110-01 Colombo, Ceylon. February 1942..jpg 030111-01 Colombo, Ceylon. February 1942..jpg 030111-05 Colombo, Ceylon. February 1942..jpg

030113-03.JPG 030115-02 Colombo, Ceylon. February 1942..JPG
__________________
One of the original Australian CMP hunters.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-02-16, 14:32
Mike K's Avatar
Mike K Mike K is offline
Fan of Lord Nuffield
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 5,883
Default numbers

Don't know if this means anything but one of the Morris CS8's I have here has the British WO census nr. on the bonnet . And the first Morris PU 8cwt I aquired, has the strange "O" prefix number on the bonnet - these "O" census numbers appear on vehicles in Palestine , as seen in the AWM Palestine photos . Specifically, Morris 15 cwt and 8cwt trucks on issue to the AIF . Nobody can tell me what these numbers mean - their origin . This anomaly has everybody stumped
__________________
1940 cab 11 C8
1940 Morris-Commercial PU
1941 Morris-Commercial CS8
1940 Chev. 15cwt GS Van ( Aust.)
1942-45 Jeep salad
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24-02-16, 16:52
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,372
Default

Tony,

H4522081 is not listed within the Refugee block.

All tractors within that block are (later?) H454XXXX registrations.

Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Acquisition comes home. James Gosling The Armour Forum 8 21-07-15 22:55
Latest acquisition James Gosling The Softskin Forum 14 19-04-15 07:59
New acquisition M37B1 sapper740 Post-war Military Vehicles 2 26-11-09 15:04


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016