![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, but you need to pass the safety anyway even to get historic plates - I was talking about getting regular plates.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David,
I was talking about any plates as well. Here is a quote from the MOT site regarding seat belts; "No seatbelts needed Seatbelts are not required in the following vehicles: •buses (including school buses) •other large commercial vehicles (over 4,536 kg) that don't require seatbelts to be installed in rear seating positions at the time of manufacture •vehicles that were manufactured in or imported into Canada before January 1, 1974 •vehicles manufactured without seatbelt assemblies for each seating position" Turn signals, air bags, 5 mph bumpers, etc. are treated similarly with regard to plating a vehicle in general. The Ontario Safety Standards Certificate - (form 5) makes no mention of what class of plate that can be issued for the vehicle. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
David,
the words "not fitted at time of manufacture" is all that needs to be satisfied. I agree with Jack's post and infact have gone through the circus when a testing mechanic does not know the rules. There are times when I have been wrong, once was when I had to fit a windshield and wipers and wash bottle to pass a safety. Remember there is no requirement to operate with that windshield only to have it at the time of the safety. It is a bit of a jungle out there. A number of the Land Rovers I register have no reversing light fitted at time of manufacture.
__________________
Robin Craig Home of the Maple Leaf Adapter 2 Canadian Mk1 Ferrets Kawasaki KLR250 CFR 95-10908 ex PPCLI Canadair CL70 CFR 58-91588 Armstrong MT500 serial CFR 86-78530 Two Canam 250s Land Rover S3 Commanders Caravan Carawagon 16 GN 07 Trailer Cargo 3/4 T 2WHD 38 GJ 62 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just as a warning, anyone needing a safety in Ontario should get it done at the earliest opportunity. There are new, much more stringent regulations coming in to effect in July.
Barry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you for the warning Barry.
Without going into nauseating detail, can you give an idea of the types of changes we can anticipate? And, do you know of a web link we can go to in order to educate ourselves? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Grant, Janet says I go into nauseating detail every time I tell a story. If you go to the link below and scroll half way down the page you will see "Summary of Changes Effective July 1, 2016". That will give you a quickie on some of the changes. Dirty battery cables is one where we will get grief from customers. We have people who argue about a tire that is so thin we can see the air in it. A mandatory road test will be difficult in an uninsured, unplated vehicle. Previous we could do it in our driveway. We must record and provide the customer with tread depth measurements and brake component measurements, including the emergency brake. Extra costs with drum emergency brakes. There will be problems with the vehicles with the emergency shoes that are inside the rotor. By the time I get the rusty old rotor hammered off the emergency brake falls out on the floor.
![]() for a free look over. It is amazing the number of vehicles we condemn without even getting up on a hoist. I think our biggest issue will be rusty brake lines. A judgement call at best but a mechanic was recently criminally charged after a vehicle was in an accident 30 days after the inspection. We are not allowed to hammer the brake pedal down. See Grant I am doing it again. Cheers, Barry http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/tru...ons.shtml#form View the draft proposed changes here. This will likely be the new standaeds. http://www.ontariocanada.com/registr...chmentId=27411 Last edited by Barry Churcher; 20-12-15 at 15:17. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have heard complaint from a mechanic here in Manitoba that the inspections do miss some safety related items. For instance, an automatic transmission line that is badly leaking is not a safety issue by Manitoba inspection standards. I can assure you that it is when the fluid catches fire on the hot exhaust. He queried the inspection section of Manitoba and they told him it was not an issue for the inspection form, and there was nothing he could do.
We do not have the corrosion problems here in Manitoba that you guys out East have, so brake lines rusting through are not really an issue. But I can certainly understand why it would be in Southern Ontario. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Terry Warner - 74-????? M151A2 - 70-08876 M38A1 - 53-71233 M100CDN trailer Beware! The Green Disease walks among us! |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
When I first had my Canadian Bombardier Iltis inspected and put on the road, I had used a local dealership in Ottawa that had a service contract with DND for the Bombardier Iltis, so they were already familiar with the vehicle. I can see this may be more complicated with an older vehicle. A quick read of the new standards suggests that this new process would certainly fail many historic military vehicles that were approved under the current regulations. Quote:
Your thoughts? Stuart |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sold: CMP C-15A Wire 3 Vehicle Plates | RichCam | For Sale Or Wanted | 1 | 15-05-15 02:50 |
Historic Vehicle Association - 2010 Study | Phil Waterman | The MLU Sappers Mess | 4 | 30-11-13 15:02 |
Historic commercial vehicle rally | Euan McDonald | Military Shows & Events | 4 | 18-11-12 22:32 |
Club Historic Rego plates | Ryan | The Sergeants' Mess | 9 | 29-06-07 16:29 |
DMKF - Danish Historic Military Vehicle Association | Hanno Spoelstra | The Softskin Forum | 5 | 03-12-04 01:36 |