Early Mk.I* "TL13F", CB180

[kevin powles]

Originally Posted by rob love

Kevin

Your lettering and numbering is the early domestic (in Canada) system.

The upper letters will denote the unit or training school. I can't quite make out your letters. It is possible the last part of it is CSR for Canadian Scottish Regiment.....perhaps the first part is HMG for heavy machine gun?

Below that is the T which is for tanks and carriers including standard, 2 pdr equipped and mortar.

The numbers below that are the year. It can be the following year from production.....consider it more the year it was given the DND registration, followed by a-1-, followed by a sequential number which can be one to four digits indicating it's registration number. By what I have seen these appeared to be applied almost in batches locally rather than each vehicle being given a number as they left the factories.

So in the end your numbering is:

ABCDE (unit or school designation)
T (carrier)
41-1-405 DND registration for 1941, being the 405th vehicle registered.

If you can bring up the lettering more clearly for your unit we may be able to decipher it.

This registration system of numbering was changed in 42 to a different format. Some of the earlier vehicles got re-numbered and some didn't.

Thanks Robe, Thants Great !. heres another pic of it slight diff angle.

many thanks kevin, Ironic too as ive mounnted a Vickers M.G. in it!.

[rob love]

That angle shows a little more.

I suspect it may have 2ND BN (M.G.) C.S.R.

Cannot guarantee the small letters beside the 2 or the B. You will have to look for traces of paint in those areas.

Good luck finding photos of the unit during that short time period. There is a unit of Cdn Scottish still in BC. If they have a museum, there may be photos.

http://www.canadianscottishregiment....p?page_id=1021

They have a book available for sale. Perhaps there are relevant photos in it.

[kevin powles]

Thanks Rob, Have sent them an email. I will certainly mark it back up correctly, the carrier has been grit blasted now.
here's a short cut to a bren carrier with number which looks like 41.1.680 on there website.

http://www.canadianscottishregiment....php?LIMIT7=48#

kevin.

[rob love]

Originally Posted by kevin powles

Thanks Rob, Have sent them an email. I will certainly mark it back up correctly, the carrier has been grit blasted now.
here's a short cut to a bren carrier with number which looks like 41.1.680 on there website.

http://www.canadianscottishregiment....php?LIMIT7=48#

kevin.

I had to go through your link to find the photo. If it is the one I think you are talking about there are two carriers. It looks like the other carrier is 41.1.679. Note that they are at Debert by that time, which is on the Eastern coast, several thousand miles away from BC where the unit was originally, so the carrier numbers and markings on the carrier in this photo will differ from your carrier. Units will not have dragged their equipment across the country with them, and Debert may have been a bit of a training depot, so the carriers may not get any markings beyond the DND number.

Anyway, we are really getting off track from the TL13 thread. Perhaps this discussion could be moved to it's own thread.

[Wayne Hingley]

Debert was a training camp near Truro, Nova Scotia. Soldiers from across Canada arrived in Debert by rail, for essentially "basic training" and weapons training prior to departing from Halifax to Europe.

[Nech]

Another details of the current condition, engine compartment.

[Nech]

..and another.

[Lynn Eades]

Lots of great detail here. I see British throttle linkages and fuel change over valve, but of current interest is the kinked lower hoses that Rob has been talking about in another thread.

I imagine that the many parts that have changed from British to Canadian have done so because of supply and standardization reasons. The (under performing?)SolexCarb and maybe the Lucas generator are two of those items.

Were these early Canadian carriers fitted with the white faced CAV ammeters that the British carriers had?