MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-11-15, 07:29
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

And on page 204 it says it again for the fuel sender screws,10-32, but then it also says for the "Cap and tube outlet", Screw # 2BA x 3/8 round head qty 4.

Isn't that Irish, to have two different, but visibly indistinguishable standards melded together in one fuel tank.

How stupid of me to think they would be the same!
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....

Last edited by Lynn Eades; 05-11-15 at 07:36.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-15, 14:01
Stew Robertson Stew Robertson is offline
Staghound
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rockwood, ON, Canada
Posts: 268
Default

It must of been engineered by two different engineers
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-11-15, 14:07
Stew Robertson Stew Robertson is offline
Staghound
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rockwood, ON, Canada
Posts: 268
Default

no matter what size, the 10 /32 will work, as by the time the thread is cleaned with a 10/32 tap the screw will have enough pull to hold and seal
But that is just my opinion /millwright for the last 50yrars/Fixer of engineers mistakes
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-15, 14:10
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew Robertson View Post
It must of been engineered by two different engineers
Agreed: the filler neck is original British, so would be British threads. The sending unit flange is a Cdn design, so would be North American threads. Makes perfect sense.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-11-15, 17:00
Bob Carriere Bob Carriere is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hammond, Ontario
Posts: 5,259
Default Same here....

We have used 10/32 on many tanks with good sealing and no thread issues.
__________________
Bob Carriere....B.T.B
C15a Cab 11
Hammond, Ontario
Canada
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-11-15, 18:48
Richard Farrant's Avatar
Richard Farrant Richard Farrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,641
Default

As the British design only used dipsticks in petrol tanks, the addition of the sender units in the Canadian design, would obviously use hardware and tooling that they had to hand in their country. As much as possible was kept interchangeable.
I have come across differences in the axle pinion shafts though, the threaded hole in the end of the pinion shaft, I have found with both NF and NC threads, anyone come across that?
__________________
Richard

1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2
Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS
KVE President & KVE News Editor
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-11-15, 21:43
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

Richard, the tooling was in use in Canada for the making of the previous 40, 000+? (number unknown to me) carrier fuel tanks, without senders.

The fuel tank sender, and the fuel pick up both have a Ford of Canada part number.
The pick up mounting ring has a TL (Brit?) part number. Maybe this is the problem. (they too would have been made by Ford of Canada)

On the Pinions, yes I have seen both. The fine thread seems more logical to me. I have wondered if the difference was the origin. Brit, Can. or US?
The small pinion bearing was different between U.K. and Can. production.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-11-15, 04:27
Jim Burrill Jim Burrill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hatfield, PA, USA
Posts: 430
Default

I just got in new sender units from Macs' Auto. Comes with new screws and gaskets. So, looks like the bit of drilling and re-tapping will be in SAE.

The Fuel pick-up uses BA then? OK, I have taps for that...

Thanks everyone for responding!

Oh, while I didn't find the extension for the distributor, I did find one in the box of spare distributor parts that came with the carrier. Will be putting it allon this weekend.

Also got in a new Fuel pump so I may already be prepared for a dead fuel pump gasket from sitting so long.

I did a pretty good search under the engine with hands and a reach magnet, with no luck, I had just vaccumed the inside of the hull pretty thoroughly only a few days before this.

A few nuts and bolts and two live .38 S&W bullets with bad primers!

Oh, a rebuild plate on the front right side of the engine says it was rebuilt in 48. More details to follow for those that are interested!

Again, everyone! Thanks for your help!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chev fuel tank sender Wayne Henderson The Restoration Forum 7 04-04-13 14:54
Iltis fuel sender unit Stuart Fedak Post-war Military Vehicles 3 01-09-12 15:13
WTB: fuel level sender for M8 armored car gas tank daninnm For Sale Or Wanted 1 28-09-09 00:31
600 gallon Type A3 fuel trailer Iain Wyllie WW2 Military History & Equipment 4 22-04-08 18:28
#12 cab fuel sender switch lever wanted Darren Abbott The Softskin Forum 4 11-01-07 00:06


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016