|
|
#1
31-10-04, 21:58
|
||||
|
||||
Bullbar debate
 This debate has been going on for some time in Australia and at least this chappie seen in the carpark behind my office makes his stand clear.
__________________
Film maker 42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains 42 FGT No9 (Aust) 42 F15 Keith Webb Macleod, Victoria Australia Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern 
|
|
#2
31-10-04, 22:23
|
||||
|
||||
|
I always thought stupid pedestrians to be fair game...
   
__________________
SUNRAY SENDS AND ENDS :remember :support
|
|
#3
01-11-04, 03:27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
After several ha'penny shoves with the turbines, I got charged with littering. 
__________________
PRONTO SENDS
|
|
#4
01-11-04, 10:16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bullbars
Bullbars have quite a following in rural areas (along with B&S balls and Bundaberg rum), and are seen as a practical addition to any vehicle. Not only do they add pleasing lines to a bland vehicle, they also offer a place to mount up to 6 aerials (UHF radio, CB radio, CDMA mobile phone, GSM mobile phone, car radio and a few dummies or spares just for looks) and a similar number of spotlights. Very practical! They also happen to magnify injuries to pedestrians and other vehicles, and increase fuel consumption and front tyre wear but thats a small price to pay.
|
|
#5
01-11-04, 11:18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bullbars
Quote:
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
