MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > The Wireless Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-10-14, 00:34
Chris Suslowicz Chris Suslowicz is offline
Junior Password Gnome
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: England
Posts: 871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Dunlop View Post
I have an NOS Carriers No. 22 finished in a wrinkle Brown No. 2 that has puzzled me for years. Top dead centre of the rear base channel is 'PC 72287 C' in white. The leading edge of the front base channel has 'FRONT' stencilled in white.

To my eye, there does not seem to be anything asymmetrical about this carrier that would necessitate having to identify a specific orientation, or have I been missing something all these years?

David
I've never met the No.22 carrier, but as far as I am aware it's symmetrical. The only possible reason for there being a "front" and "back" is if it's been drilled for an earth
terminal (at front right) like the Carrier No.25, or at the ends of the channel to take the earthing strap from the rhs of the set, though I think they used the shock absorber bolt for that.

They may have stencilled it with a "FRONT" marking just to be consistent with all the other set carriers which were definitely "handed" for the supply unit mounting, etc.

Incidentally, there are a lot more carriers than the 1,2,3 and 21,22,23,25 in the documentation, intended to cover things like the WS19HP and twin WS19 installations for Command tanks, et cetera. Some of them look Very Odd Indeed.

Chris.
I have Carriers No.1 (plated steel), 21 (painted No.1), 3 (or 23, hard to tell) (wooden board) and 25 (all-welded steel with a single long strap that goes around everything).

I'm missing the adapter plate for the supply unit for the No.25. (This is the "house shaped" plate with four holes to allow it to be screwed to the top of the supply unit, a "step fold" to clear the studs on the end of the strap clamp, and two keyhole slots to take the said studs.
Its purpose is to reverse the direction of the keyhole slots in the supply unit case (intended for when it's laid on its side on the set top), which point the wrong way for the clamping strap. (The "tails" of the slots need to point to the right for this mounting to work.) Does anyone have one that they could photograph and/or measure, please?

Accurate measurements of the No.2 (or 22) would also be very useful.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-10-14, 02:01
Richard Farrant's Avatar
Richard Farrant Richard Farrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,641
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Suslowicz View Post
I've never met the No.22 carrier, but as far as I am aware it's symmetrical. The only possible reason for there being a "front" and "back" is if it's been drilled for an earth
terminal (at front right) like the Carrier No.25, or at the ends of the channel to take the earthing strap from the rhs of the set, though I think they used the shock absorber bolt for that.

They may have stencilled it with a "FRONT" marking just to be consistent with all the other set carriers which were definitely "handed" for the supply unit mounting, etc.

Hi Chris,
This picture of a No.22 Carrier does not look symmetrical, the angle bracket looks to be closer to the end on the right. So there looks to be good reason for it to be marked Front.

regards, Richard
Attached Images
File Type: jpg No.22 Carrier.JPG (107.2 KB, 26 views)
__________________
Richard

1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2
Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS
KVE President & KVE News Editor
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-10-14, 03:49
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,613
Default

Isn't there another piece that goes on the right end to hold a bit of a terminal board for the power wires? The terminal block C1? Or does it mount on the "plate, metal mounting, carrier sets C1"?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-10-14, 07:26
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,659
Default

Richard.

Thanks for posting that picture. It prompted me to grab a tape measure and go hunting in the basement for my No. 22 Carrier for a closer look.

Sure enough. The distance from the left rail to the end of the base channel is 62mm. The distance from the right rail to the end of the base channel on that side is just 50mm, so for some reason, spacing is critical from one end to the other with this particular Carrier.

Best regards,


David
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-10-14, 01:52
Chris Suslowicz Chris Suslowicz is offline
Junior Password Gnome
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: England
Posts: 871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Farrant View Post
Hi Chris,
This picture of a No.22 Carrier does not look symmetrical, the angle bracket looks to be closer to the end on the right. So there looks to be good reason for it to be marked Front.

regards, Richard
Aha! The left hand end also has an earthing strap fitted: Item 31 if you blow the image up.

Presumably that bolts to the radio table/vehicle metalwork, and the WS19 earthing strap to the other end of the carrier?

There may be room to get a power connector on the left hand end, but the standard "Batten, Terminal, 2-pt" is rather too large, I think. I suspect the extra clearance on the left hand side is for power and harness cabling to be routed clear of the front panel.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-09-18, 04:06
Russell Boaler Russell Boaler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 75
Default Securing straps

Reviving this thread I thought I'd post a picture of the various securing straps used with the carriers. I have 5 sets of straps and all are different. The first two are manufactured with conveyor type belting but of different grades, the third is stitched canvas. The fourth is black conveyor type belting and the last is of webbing construction. I suspect that it could just be that each were produced by different manufacturers who used materials that they already familiar with or had easy access to.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg WS19 straps.jpg (328.0 KB, 22 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-03-19, 00:52
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,069
Default

Is the 22 radio cradle etc still used on a Mk2 carrier ?
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-03-19, 04:17
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,659
Default

From what I have seen, Richard, both the No 21 and No 22 Carrier can be used for a 19-Set installation in that UC. Either one is centered in the space across the front right corner of the rear compartment.

If you can get your hands on a copy of Bill Gregg’s Profile No. 5 you can see how either installation is set up.

David
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-03-19, 12:41
Tim Bell's Avatar
Tim Bell Tim Bell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall
Posts: 804
Default

I have a roll of this webbing strap somewhere... I'll have a look for it.

Happy to sell some if it is the right stuff.


Tim
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale: U.S Vietnam War 1960's survival radio receiver transmitter radio Dave42MB For Sale Or Wanted 4 23-01-14 20:12
New Carriers Bob Moseley (RIP) The Carrier Forum 0 14-06-13 11:20
Carriers out and about matilda IIA The Carrier Forum 12 13-11-11 07:35
Land Rover Radio bits wanted (US Radio Gear) phoenix Post-war Military Vehicles 3 23-09-08 15:56
T-16's in Calgary Highlanders' Anti-Tank Platoon peter simundson The Carrier Forum 18 14-04-07 22:47


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:18.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016