MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27-07-14, 21:34
motto motto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Woodend,Victoria,Australia
Posts: 1,068
Default

Although the packaging is different (the packet that I have looks more modern) the big end shells that Mike found on E-bay appear to be similar in thickness to the Michigan 77, CLEVITE set that I purchased from Jim Carter a few years ago.
The shells appear unusually thin as the rods were not made to take shells.
I'm sure that 's what the reference to 're-manufacturers assemblies' is all about. The rods need to be precision bored.
This brings us back to the original question posed by Richard, 'what is the bore diameter of the big end to take these shells?'
I would also like to know the answer.

David
__________________
Hell no! I'm not that old!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-07-14, 21:51
Richard Farrant's Avatar
Richard Farrant Richard Farrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,641
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by motto View Post
Although the packaging is different (the packet that I have looks more modern) the big end shells that Mike found on E-bay appear to be similar in thickness to the Michigan 77, CLEVITE set that I purchased from Jim Carter a few years ago.
The shells appear unusually thin as the rods were not made to take shells.
I'm sure that 's what the reference to 're-manufacturers assemblies' is all about. The rods need to be precision bored.
This brings us back to the original question posed by Richard, 'what is the bore diameter of the big end to take these shells?'
I would also like to know the answer.

David
Thanks Dave,
There is more to this saga, on inspecting one con-rod so far, the big end cap joint faces looks to have been ground roughly and on laying the faces on a surface plate, it rocks! Not looking good

I fear more will be revealed tomorrow.

Thanks for all the responses so far
__________________
Richard

1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2
Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS
KVE President & KVE News Editor
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-07-14, 07:03
John Mackie John Mackie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
Default

Richard, Repco Australia sold slipper bearings fit the 216 chev, part # 6B3308 in std, 002 , 010 , 020 , 030 , 040 , and 060. The dimensions quoted are shaft 23.311 / 2.312 tunnel 2.403 / 2.404 wall o.0452 / 0.0455 .
there is a page showing the machining necessary. if you need it I will have to go elseware to have it scanned.
They also made slipper bearings for Ford 100E (E93A ??)
__________________
John Mackie (Snr) VK2ZDM

Ford GPW- script
#3A Ford Trailer
M3A1 White Scout Car
-Under restoration-
1941 Ford Truck (Tex Morton)
F15A Blitz
Radio sets- #19, #122, #62, ART13, and Command
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-07-14, 09:39
Richard Farrant's Avatar
Richard Farrant Richard Farrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,641
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John 4172 View Post
Richard, Repco Australia sold slipper bearings fit the 216 chev, part # 6B3308 in std, 002 , 010 , 020 , 030 , 040 , and 060. The dimensions quoted are shaft 23.311 / 2.312 tunnel 2.403 / 2.404 wall o.0452 / 0.0455 .
there is a page showing the machining necessary. if you need it I will have to go elseware to have it scanned.
They also made slipper bearings for Ford 100E (E93A ??)
hi John,
Thanks for the dimension of the tunnel, I will check that out and see how it works out.

I may be back!

regards, Richard
__________________
Richard

1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2
Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS
KVE President & KVE News Editor
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-07-14, 00:05
Richard Farrant's Avatar
Richard Farrant Richard Farrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,641
Default

Thanks John for your help. The inside diameter of con-rod (without shell fitted) was just what I needed.

Also thank you to everyone else who responded, much appreciated.

regards, Richard
__________________
Richard

1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2
Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS
KVE President & KVE News Editor
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-07-14, 01:02
motto motto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Woodend,Victoria,Australia
Posts: 1,068
Default Figuring the figures

Thanks John. That dimension of 2.403/2.404 is what I wanted.
I would very much like a copy of the page that you mention giving machining requirements if convenient.
No hurry at all but it would be nice to have.

David
__________________
Hell no! I'm not that old!

Last edited by motto; 30-07-14 at 01:13.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chevrolet CMP Engine variants BSM The Softskin Forum 20 10-01-18 14:40
Motor Oil: "Riding the Film" 1937 Chevrolet Engine Lubrication Hanno Spoelstra The Softskin Forum 2 21-01-14 10:27
Australian Chevrolet 216 engine owners Lionelgee The Restoration Forum 22 17-10-09 05:32
chevrolet 216 stovebolt engine and box malcolm erik bogaert For Sale Or Wanted 0 21-03-09 11:28
Chevrolet engine bits Maurice Donckers For Sale Or Wanted 2 20-08-08 10:48


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016