![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Hanno, the suspension looked familiar as it looks like a common system to a number of tanks. I'd never seen this profile previously and the pic doesn't show it as heavily armed. Thanks for your reply and links. Cheers Tim
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Tim,
According to the documentation available, they were equipped with 3 x .30 Cal. MGs. But this seems to have been the idea of the manufacturer, in practice so many MGs in a confined space was not practical. I think these "tanks" could be classified as the "crawl" phase in "crawl-walk-run". Amazing how much progress was made during the course of WW2. Hanno
__________________
Regards, Hanno -------------------------- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Hanno, I guess after WW1 it was a steep learning curve, developing tracked vehicles in the hope another war wouldn't come along. It was interesting reading your link and the development of this vehicle by the marines. Weight restrictions etc. but it seems it was really a light tank for infantry support with greater expectations on it than it could provide at the time.
My interest has developed through model making as a kid, I guess I'm surprised I've never seen a model of this tank, when there seems to be a variation on just about every other vehicle that saw some kind of service. Thanks though, and thanks for your widespread input on this site. Cheers Tim |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stuart tank fuel tank | Luke R | The Armour Forum | 11 | 17-09-14 12:42 |
M38A1 gas tank vs CJ5 gas tank | maple_leaf_eh | Post-war Military Vehicles | 3 | 31-05-14 21:03 |
MK1 Canadian tank hunter radiator overflow tank | kevin powles | The Carrier Forum | 5 | 08-06-09 20:21 |
RE: Churchill Tank at Melbourne Tank Museum Auction | EnfieldGuy | For Sale Or Wanted | 0 | 17-05-06 04:34 |