![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Would this difference also involve those CMP's sent to India as well? I am aware the Indian ones had heavier steering boxes so maybe the chassis was heavier / thicker? Richard
__________________
Richard 1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2 Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS KVE President & KVE News Editor |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You raise an interesting question though. CMP chassis deliveries to India and Australia differed from Canadian production, in that neither country received the heavy duty axles and steering box until much later in the war. I've never really understood why this should be so. Presumably they were prioritized for Canadian production initially, but that doesn't explain why it took years to switch production from light duty components to heavy duty components. It seems to me there must be some other reason for persisting with light duty components for these particular exports, but I can't imagine what it could be. Does anyone else have any clues...? As far as the siderails are concerned - to the best of my knowledge there's no difference between siderails on early production chassis (ie. light duty components) and late production chassis (ie. heavy duty components). I believe the heavy duty Chev steering box is directly interchangeable, and the steering box on Fords is upgradeable by changing the RHF spring hanger, which is designed to be interchangeable without drilling new holes. The only other change made was to the F60S/L chassis, which was strengthened in the midsection. That is, externally fitted reinforcement plates, and extension of the inner skin rearwards by approx 2 feet. None of this additional reinforcement was done on the Chev chassis as the siderails are much beefier than Fords.
__________________
One of the original Australian CMP hunters. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi All
I'd noted the rectangle vs trapezoid vents, and always wonder what civilian application they were drawn from. We probably should not be locked to the source being Ford or Chevy given the mix and match approach to the sources of other CMP parts. Either type requires a fair amount of stamping and fabrication. So who can find the civilian version on a `30s vehicle. Cheers Phil
__________________
Phil Waterman `41 C60L Pattern 12 `42 C60S Radio Pattern 13 `45 HUP http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/ New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The rectangular vent was used on Holden built trucks, (cars too?) so it was a standard die design for the vents. Anyone care to have a stab at the supplementary one about percentages?
__________________
Film maker 42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains 42 FGT No9 (Aust) 42 F15 Keith Webb Macleod, Victoria Australia Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
World of Tanks Game | easo | The Sergeants' Mess | 2 | 14-08-12 23:12 |
Brain tease | Phil Waterman | The Restoration Forum | 7 | 04-11-08 17:35 |
Gears a little brain teaser | Pete Ashby | The Restoration Forum | 1 | 09-07-07 23:38 |
Teaser | servicepub (RIP) | For Sale Or Wanted | 6 | 20-01-07 05:10 |
Crown & Anchor (board game) | RCAMuseum | WW2 Military History & Equipment | 1 | 01-10-03 20:59 |