MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-12-13, 15:42
James Gosling James Gosling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 255
Default

Here are some pictures of the damage to the footwell, roof and the blown out fuel tank.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Otter #2 007.jpg (40.6 KB, 57 views)
File Type: jpg Otter #2 001.jpg (50.0 KB, 57 views)
File Type: jpg Otter #2 010.jpg (51.9 KB, 64 views)
File Type: jpg Otter #2 009.jpg (49.7 KB, 64 views)
File Type: jpg Otter #2 008.jpg (47.2 KB, 61 views)
__________________
C15 TA 1944
Ford Lynx 1945
C8A HUP 1943
Willys MB Jeep 1942
New Zealand pattern wheeled carrier 1943 (project1)
New Zealand pattern wheeled carrier 1943 (project2)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-12-13, 14:03
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Gosling View Post
Here are some pictures of the damage to the footwell, roof and the blown out fuel tank.
James, your question re. the Otter bracket reminded me of this thread.

Looking at the damage on your Otter, there are a couple of basic options for its restoration:
  1. Leave in as-is Normandy battlefield relic state
  2. Repair to minimal running condition with all damage and rust retained (much like the Pirbright M3 Grant Tank)
  3. Restore to in-service battle-damage repaired condition
  4. Restore to factory-new condition
As stated before, my preference would be to go for option 3.

Seeing the damage, I wonder if this Otter could have sustained this type of damage without being written off immediately? In reality it was of course written off, which is why it could be recovered in this state by Mr Leloup after the war.

But: what if there is a reasoning that could be made that this Otter sustained severe damage, but could have been repaired to running order within, say 48 hrs? If the chassis and running gear was not damaged, it could have been repaired and quickly returned to service if there was a need but no replacements available, right?

The scenario could have been that after removing casualties (*) REME LAD crews could have worked round the clock, patching the armour, rigging up a new fuel tank and get it back in action as a turretless recce car. As Terry worded it aptly, restoring it as such you would tell the story of the inventive use of existing or salvaged parts to make urgent repairs in wartime conditions. This would highlight the performance of front-line soldier-mechanics, and put a tangible exhibit in the field to demonstrate the astounding amounts of repair/conversion work carried out in very short periods during WW2 (like the conversion of M7 Priests into Kangaroos).

I wish you all the wisdom with the choice of the options you have with this Otter, and look forward to seeing the end result. I know my boys and Tony will line up again for a ride

Hanno

(*) To get a graphic picture of what was entailed to get battle-damaged tanks back in action, I would recommend reading the book "Death Traps" by US 3rd Armored WW2 veteran Belton Cooper.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-12-13, 16:04
James Gosling James Gosling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 255
Default

Hi Hanno,

Thank you for the suggestions. I do like your idea of the field patch up! It is certainly something to mull over.

Yesterday I cleared out about 4 inches of tree mulch from the inside and found more damage. These holes are right below the blown in section of roof. I'm going to have a look underneath tomorrow and see if the shrapnal hit anything else. Hopefully it missed the transfer case! Notice the slice out of the foot ring for the turret basket, its right above one of the holes.
James
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Otter floor 004.jpg (59.1 KB, 46 views)
File Type: jpg Otter floor 002.jpg (50.4 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg Otter floor 001.jpg (55.3 KB, 52 views)
__________________
C15 TA 1944
Ford Lynx 1945
C8A HUP 1943
Willys MB Jeep 1942
New Zealand pattern wheeled carrier 1943 (project1)
New Zealand pattern wheeled carrier 1943 (project2)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-12-13, 18:47
Bob Cohoon Bob Cohoon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bedford, Quebec
Posts: 129
Default damage

Just a thought, but maybe you can do standard battle damage repair on 90 % of it, and leave a small spot as-is to preserve the history of what happened to it, maybe that jagged hole in the side plate.People will ask why is it like that, and then the history could be explained
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-12-13, 17:30
lssah2025's Avatar
lssah2025 lssah2025 is offline
Driver Advance!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: St. Louis, Mo, and OCONUS
Posts: 487
Default Congrats

Looking good James.....did you ever get any other information on the other item we were talking about?
__________________
39 Austin 8 Tourer
42 Humber Heavy Utility
42 C15A Wireless Truck
43 Humber AC MK IV F133744 "Vandal" tri-owner
43 A27L Centaur MK III T185481
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-12-13, 17:54
James Gosling James Gosling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 255
Default

Hi Lance,

No, I only managed last week to get a reply on some spares. A long proces!!!
__________________
C15 TA 1944
Ford Lynx 1945
C8A HUP 1943
Willys MB Jeep 1942
New Zealand pattern wheeled carrier 1943 (project1)
New Zealand pattern wheeled carrier 1943 (project2)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-12-13, 18:41
lssah2025's Avatar
lssah2025 lssah2025 is offline
Driver Advance!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: St. Louis, Mo, and OCONUS
Posts: 487
Default

Yea I have pretty much given up on that and some other things.
__________________
39 Austin 8 Tourer
42 Humber Heavy Utility
42 C15A Wireless Truck
43 Humber AC MK IV F133744 "Vandal" tri-owner
43 A27L Centaur MK III T185481
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-09-19, 22:37
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default Dutch treat

Gary Burns now owns this Otter. He has restored the "Normandy battle damage". I am using quotes as Gary noted that this Otter is fitted with an extra latch to keep the doors open. He analysed many photos and concluded that only the post war Dutch ones have these latches fitted. So, it is more likely this Otter was damaged on a Dutch range, rather than in Normandy...

69991665_10220676376006194_4484259685989351424_o.jpg 69932939_10220678631382577_2604959473898356736_o.jpg


I looked at a few photos and I think Gary has proved the French owner made up a story for his Otter. Anyhow, it is now in good hands and is under restoration.

Take a close look, these Otters have a latch to keep the doors in the open position:

70475311_928119557525253_4868217946796720128_n.jpg 69905201_928118707525338_6074879697118822400_n.jpg

Not all Dutch Otters had them, though:

69848145_928118870858655_2555151163368407040_n.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-12-22, 12:11
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default

Gary Burns just completed his restoration on this Otter - a job very well done!

“ Tarka basking in the mid winter sun driven out under it's own power for the first time in probably 60 years very proud been a task but got there with the help of many new friends cheers to all ”

765F3248-C592-47C3-B9BC-C9E6D2C8AA4B.jpeg 5B339C99-DFA9-4E75-A954-829DFF83FE88.jpeg 8DEDF40A-ED4F-442A-99EE-8265E67A8DEA.jpeg E7F69194-5FBB-467E-9E13-0877D3E4DA1E.jpeg
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-12-22, 22:15
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default

See the 300+ photos documenting Gary's restoration project here: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?...8734966&type=3
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 13-12-15, 12:33
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Gosling View Post
Hi Hanno,

Thank you for the suggestions. I do like your idea of the field patch up! It is certainly something to mull over.
James,

Here are a few pictures from TANK RECOVERY to help you in your mulling over this subject

The subject vehicle in the pictures is a Sherman but I do not know why they would not do this on light armoured vehicles if such a field repair could return them into service.

12241781_1684429715136351_1710190953335764854_n.jpg 12239744_1684429755136347_9065192960131308834_n.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 13-12-15, 18:47
Tim Bell's Avatar
Tim Bell Tim Bell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall
Posts: 804
Default

Looks a little like a firefly.

Pity no other pictures in the series.

Nice photos though.

Tim
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 14-12-15, 02:14
jdmcm's Avatar
jdmcm jdmcm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Surrey, BC, CDN
Posts: 672
Default

Love the Otter! what unique piece of history...as for the damage...it'd kind of a tough call, patching as would have been done in service will leave a lot of the uninformed thinking it was a poor restoration...tough on some folks ego, not on others..completely repairing it as if it never happened seems to be like re-writing history...as for range damage..I think it is fine to leave it as long as you don't misrepresent it...it is a very interesting thing to see what kind of damage can be inflicted on armor plate...I have some plates we cut out of our range find Sherman that I kept just to be able to show people exactly what happens when a round penetrates a tank...the circle left on the inside around the point of entry is amazing...and frightening to think where those metal splinters would end up
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 14-12-15, 04:21
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,601
Default

That makes for a very interesting compromise. The range damaged plates are part of the history of the vehicle. By saving some of the more interesting examples for display with a fully restored vehicle, respects it's history and adds great value to any display of it in the future. Personally, I would go that route.

David
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F60s LAAT Census Number from Chassis Number Mark Towers The Softskin Forum 3 08-05-20 15:14
Falaise Gap: Hill 140 drama Crewman The Armour Forum 32 03-08-05 07:02
Falaise Gap: Losses and successes of the Canadian 4th Armoured Division Crewman The Armour Forum 26 28-05-05 02:01
Falaise Gap: Friendly fire (not from the air) Crewman The Armour Forum 2 06-05-05 15:57
Falaise Gap: Air drops for the armoured divisions Crewman The Armour Forum 0 27-03-05 17:23


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:02.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016