MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-07-13, 02:56
harrygrey382 harrygrey382 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Australia - nr Coolah NSW
Posts: 58
Default

ok great, just need to fill'er up with coolant then I'll give it a go. I'll be on my own as none of the other blokes here are up to it I think, or at least I don't trust them to be...

This manual covers all Chev blitzs and I er on the side of larger gaps so I'm happy with .01 and .02
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-07-13, 09:02
Bob McNeill Bob McNeill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange, NSW Australia
Posts: 465
Default tappets

caution, with clearance of 0.01 and 0.02, the 0.01 sounds OK but 0.02 is too wide and are you running the valves with the caps on or off, in the manual it gives the change in clearance as engine warms up, I,d bring the exhaust down to 0.012- 0.015. my 2c worth.
__________________
macca C15 C15A
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-07-13, 16:08
Phil Waterman Phil Waterman is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Temple, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 3,929
Default More on adjusting the valves

Hi Harry

From your recent post I assume you are doing this on your C15 without the body installed, which makes it easier than it will be once the body and nose are there, and we won't even talk about trying to do it on Pat 11 and 12 on those even once you remove all the dog house sheet metal it isn't easy.

There have been several good threads on this in the past that had some useful information take a look at http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/sh...ad.php?t=11791 About half way down the page there is a post from Keith Orpin with a useful bit of information about which cylinders can be done at the same time if you are using the engine not running approach.

Concerning oil splashing around with the cover off is minimal even with the later 261 with 40PSI oil pressure. Take a look at some of the engine video on my web site you can see the engines running with the covers off.
http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/EngineTesting.htm take a look at the 235 videos they also show the engine running with a clear side cover on the test stand.

For me I seem to get better results setting the valves with the engine hot not running. Have done it both ways with the engine at room temperature with the engine on the test stand just to get a starting point. Then later when the engine has had a chance to run in with the engine hot. Biggest issue is to wait until the oil in the engine has reached operating temperature so the whole engine is really at that 160-180 F range. When I'm doing this on the test stand I use a water jacket block heater. Which will maintain the block temp for a long time after you run the engine. Minimum engine run time to get to equalized temperature assuming 68-70F air temp is about 1/2 hour.

Cheers Phil
__________________
Phil Waterman
`41 C60L Pattern 12
`42 C60S Radio Pattern 13
`45 HUP
http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/
New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com

Last edited by Phil Waterman; 05-07-13 at 16:14. Reason: add info
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-07-13, 23:22
harrygrey382 harrygrey382 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Australia - nr Coolah NSW
Posts: 58
Default

Thanks for the info links Phil, yep thankfully I'm doing it without the body. In fact I'll probably get everything just right mechanically before I even think about the body. Besides it puts off the time when I have to buy paint... That's quite a set up you had their! I've certainly never done testing to that extent. Couldn't find the footage of running with no cover though.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob McNeill View Post
caution, with clearance of 0.01 and 0.02, the 0.01 sounds OK but 0.02 is too wide and are you running the valves with the caps on or off, in the manual it gives the change in clearance as engine warms up, I,d bring the exhaust down to 0.012- 0.015. my 2c worth.
Yeah I can see the change in clearance with temperature, and it supports what someone says in the thread Phil linked to that clearance is the same cold and hot. Why do you then .02 is too wide when the manual specifically states it? Not being a smart arse just wondering? I know .02 is for heavy conditions, but you say caution to it - how come? I understand the problems with too bigger gaps but why would the manual be recommending something incorrect?

Last edited by harrygrey382; 05-07-13 at 23:31.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-13, 10:54
Bob McNeill Bob McNeill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange, NSW Australia
Posts: 465
Default clearance

I,ve found that the engine ran quieter and didn,t hammer the rockers or bell the valve stem, maybe our fuel is different, as this engine did not perform as well in the UK and France but once back in Aus settled down until it cracked a piston which allowed the little end bush to become loose and gouge the cylinder wall. A 216 engine I bought didn,t have the caps on the valves and to get valves out required valve stems to be ground to fit thru guides.
__________________
macca C15 C15A
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-13, 20:20
Phil Waterman Phil Waterman is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Temple, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 3,929
Default Side Valve Cover Off

Hi Harry

Here is the link to the video of the 235 running with the side cover off http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/R...20003%20--.wmv .

I've got one of 216 which I will have to find. My reason for bothering to make a Lexan cover was I wanted to understand the engine a little better, see if the lifters rotated etc. and also to understand why the side covers leak. With a half an inch of oil standing in the oil gallery the leak cause is evident.

All of this family of inline 6 Chevy have a very high capacity oil pump. In the 216 spray lubrication they don't develop that much pressure but pump a lot of oil.

As to the valve ends getting mushroomed I have never encountered that with or without the covers. When ever replacing valves particularly exhaust I don't use NOS valves instead there is a modern V8 valve which interchanges which gives you a much harder valve using those I have avoided problems with burning valves.

On the subject of burning valves, with the solid lifters be very careful about getting the valve clearance to small in trying to get rid of valve noise. Some of the civilian car manuals list at less Exhaust .013 to .015 and trucks at .018 to .020 one manual I have even says trucks which are not run at high speed or heavy load can be set to .015 if quieter operation is desired.

My experience is that if the valve train is set to the CMP values hot of Exhaust .020 and Intake .010 they make a little noise but if that noise goes away you actually have a problem. It depends a lot how hard you work the engine with the 3 tons it is much more of problem than with the HUPs and C15s. With the bigger trucks the engines really are working hard when you are driving down the high way. Just a little wear on the valve faces and/or the valve seats the clearance goes to "0" and from there to not closing very quickly and with an exhaust valve a burned valve and real loss of power can be just a few miles of driving.

I burn a 3/8" notch in an exhaust valve in 40 miles on the highway. How did I know it was that little of time? Two reasons, first I have a vacuum guage mounted on that truck and it started flicking at idle as the valve died. Second on the way over the truck had its normal power on the way back it lost a lot of power. When I pulled the cover to work on the truck the exhaust valve that was burned was the only one with no clearance. Fortunately it did damage the valve seats so I replaced all of the exhaust valves with the new harden valves and ran that engine for many years before up engining to the 261.

Have they removed the Zinc from the oil sold in Australia? If so that may be another valve train wear problem to keep in mind.

Cheers Phil
__________________
Phil Waterman
`41 C60L Pattern 12
`42 C60S Radio Pattern 13
`45 HUP
http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/
New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
up and running Bob McNeill The Carrier Forum 6 26-08-12 01:52
Stug III running Bob Cohoon The Armour Forum 0 26-09-11 17:14
They are still running ????? Mike Timoshyk The Restoration Forum 0 16-07-09 03:13
Tappets Richard Coutts-Smith The Restoration Forum 8 02-10-08 09:04
C-15 Running Specs Peter Mielke The Softskin Forum 6 25-10-03 23:21


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:32.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016