MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-06-13, 10:22
gordon's Avatar
gordon gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 707
Default More to the back ?

I'm not sure there is more rear bodywork length than the standard Command Car Lynn, just not sure.

The standard Command and Weapons chassis was 98" wheelbase, and there was very little rear overhang. This bodywork looks like there is more of it so the spare wheel location is certainly further back than I'd expect to be able to be hung on the standard bumperette position.

As I mentioned though, it doesn't have to be a 98" wheelbase chassis.
__________________
Gordon, in Scotland
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-06-13, 10:47
motto motto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Woodend,Victoria,Australia
Posts: 1,068
Default

The wheelbase looks standard Command Car to me but appears to have a bit more overhang at the rear and the end of the body more vertical.

What is needed is a decent photo of the rear end. As stated, WC wheels are heavy and I doubt the spare is merely attached to the bodywork let alone the boot lid. If it is supported by some sort of frame secured to the chassis it should be readily visible as it would have to be somewhat beefy. Plus there would have to be a means to swing it down or aside to gain access to stowage.

David
__________________
Hell no! I'm not that old!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:01.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016