Chevrolet C8a HUW - Bridge plate?

[Hanno Spoelstra]

Originally Posted by Bruce Parker

I also wonder if '3' is correct. Sure, book correct but other than really early HUP's I've only ever seen '5' as in this wartime factory photo of a 1942 HUP. The same photo series shows '5' on the HUW.

From http://www.canadiansoldiers.com/vehi...lemarkings.htm:
"These vehicle weight classifications did not necessarily denote the actual weight in tons of the vehicle (though for tracked vehicles the numbers often coincided.) The classifications were instead derived from considerations such as axle loading, distance between axles, and impact factor."

In other words, the HUP could at one time have been re-classified having to cross bridges with a 5 ton rating. As this was the lowest Bridge Class available, many vehicles seem to have been classified as such - maybe to simplify matters?

H.

[Jerry Hill]

Many thanks to one and all, having read all the comments I'll attach a bridge plate to the starboard wing/fender complete with a number 5. I need to retain two headlights to keep Mr Plod (the road traffic variety) happy, otherwise I'd have used the starboard head light fixing. Thanks again - Jerry

[Bruce Parker (RIP)]

Originally Posted by Jerry Hill

Many thanks to one and all, having read all the comments I'll attach a bridge plate to the starboard wing/fender complete with a number 5. I need to retain two headlights to keep Mr Plod (the road traffic variety) happy, otherwise I'd have used the starboard head light fixing. Thanks again - Jerry

You could always put it like the one on this just pre D-Day pic and keep both headlamps clear. This was the standard place from 1944 onwards and most 1942/43 13 cabs had it there by this time as well. I've never seen a separate bridge class disc on a CMP 13 cab in a wartime photo in the NW Europe theater. There are some early CMP's that had it in Canada but they seem to have been removed very soon after.