![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dont suppose calling it an antique Ford snowmobile would help? Like an early Bombardier...
__________________
Ralph Volkert UC 2Mk I* Upper Hull: CB 8075 Lower Hull: 8105 S/N: 9075 Date: Jun(est) 42 contract #: CDLV 213 1946 Willys Jeep 1974 Plymouth Road Runner 1987 Trans Am |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
just about as warm
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Guys,
Thanks for all the information and discussion regarding insurance. Piper and I have opted for the "safe" version of trailer transporting the carrier to/from the Legion and the Canadian Tire parking lot. The loading, chaining and unloading process is going to be much more time consuming than the actual transit time. I do concur, trailering the carrier is wisest option - not the most spectacular. Anyways, the weather forecast looks great, we should be able to get some nice pictures and we might be able to include a couple of the carrier in dark, with the lights on, when we tuck it back into it's enclosure after the outing ends at 9pm. Regards, Richard
__________________
Richard Hatkoski 1940 CMP C11 C-8 (Restoring) 1940 CMP C11 F-15A (Parts) 1941 CMP C12 C-15A (Parts) 1942 CMP C13 F-60S Dumper (Restoring) 2 x 1941 CMP C12 F-GT (Storage) 194? CMP C13 C-60X (For Sale) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The last option is to get the plates as suggested as a vintage vehicle (or even get a temporary operating permit) provided you just give the basic info (year, make, model, VIN/serial: 194X, Ford Motor Company, Universal Carrier, Serial: CT123456) without mentioning it is a tracked vehicle.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Robin makes some very valid points which should be heeded.
It should also me mentioned that a carrier on smooth pavement is very easily put out of control - not the best thing in close proximity to a parade. The details are a little foggy but I think what became the last use of a carrier on public pavement by the active military ended up with said carrier pinwheeling well into someone's living room on Avenue Rd. In Toronto. While the tracks are unlikely to harm the pavement, they will, in most cases, leave white marks that are likely to draw the attention of some whiners. I think the only legitimate registration in Ontario would be as an ATV like many of the Iltis vehicles came with. A viable precedent has been set there. This could allow an insurance policy that would not vaporize as soon as you were in trouble & the Insurance people saw a way out in that you misrepresented the vehicle. There are limitations on the use of an ATV on the road though. Another point to consider is that once it has an Ontario title the 13% HST will apply when you register it and again if you sell it. ( My only defense here is that my wet blanket is green!) |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
In Ontario, if you have an ATV registration, unless your municipality permits it, an ATV can not be driven on the road. An ATV under the highway traffic act is defined as a vehicle that one sits "astride" of.
The humble Carrier fails that litmus test, so does a Kawasaki Mule. We have protested with the Plod that a Mule loaded with fence posts and fence wire and an SMV sign owned and operated by a registered farm is an implement of husbandry. They say NO. We got popped for that one. No ticket but stern warning. We are trying to get the Ontario Federation of Agriculture to have this changed. R |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Carriers "polish" the stones in the asphalt and give the impression of marks on the road. This is what the white marks are. Unless it is ultra hot a carrier wont tear the surface, but boy is it easy to make them skate on it.
Most municipal roads department Czars find it easier to say "NO" to anyone with a tracked vehicle for a parade as they think of bulldozers with cleated track. They don't understand Carriers. Try telling them you have rubber track such as a BV 206 and they just look at you in a perplexed fashion. R Last edited by Robin Craig; 30-06-12 at 00:48. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
[QUOTE=Robin Craig;167053]In Ontario, if you have an ATV registration, unless your municipality permits it, an ATV can not be driven on the road. An ATV under the highway traffic act is defined as a vehicle that one sits "astride" of.
I too questioned the "sitting astride" definition of an ATV when I asked the local MOT office to change the registration on my Iltis from the ATV one it was issued on release from the government to a regular car registration. After several calls to head office they were able to do it. No answer was forthcoming on why they thought you could sit astride an Iltis. I have not looked into it but does anyone know what they classify an "Argo" or such off road machines that you definitely sit inside? Actually an Argo with the track option is very similar to a carrier - except for the floating option of the Argo. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|