MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-11-11, 16:48
Igor Shadrin Igor Shadrin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thailand
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cliff View Post
The fenders were cut out to give the larger sand tyres more room.

If you got to here http://s108.photobucket.com/albums/n17/MrRoo_2006/ you will see some of my models including some adaptions of the Tamiya Chev kit in 'sub albums on the Right Hand Side along with a few oddball CMP models. You will see how the guards are cut out there.
WOW, Thanks a lot for many pics to study!
I scratchbuilt chevy and Timken rear axles, too, for 1/43 projects.

Here, part of my 1/43 military diecast collection, including the chevy building:
http://rcforum.ru/album.php?u=25356

I studied the available pictures of the LRDG trucks, but they not seem to have too big wheel openings, as seen on some other similar chevy trucks. The LRDG fenders look modified: shorter and wider, like seen at the first picture attached - the side steps shape indicates the oversized fenders, to compare to civil models, although this is not exactly LRDG, but at the second picture, the similar truck is described as 1533x2… is this correct description? Very interested, the total width of these fenders.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Pict0919.jpg (54.2 KB, 76 views)
File Type: jpg a captured chevy Tobruk June 1942.jpg (102.2 KB, 79 views)

Last edited by Igor Shadrin; 11-11-11 at 16:54.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-11-11, 12:01
Kuno Kuno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Libya... most of the Time
Posts: 536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor Shadrin View Post
WOW, Thanks a lot for many pics to study!
I scratchbuilt chevy and Timken rear axles, too, for 1/43 projects.

Here, part of my 1/43 military diecast collection, including the chevy building:
http://rcforum.ru/album.php?u=25356

I studied the available pictures of the LRDG trucks, but they not seem to have too big wheel openings, as seen on some other similar chevy trucks. The LRDG fenders look modified: shorter and wider, like seen at the first picture attached - the side steps shape indicates the oversized fenders, to compare to civil models, although this is not exactly LRDG, but at the second picture, the similar truck is described as 1533x2… is this correct description? Very interested, the total width of these fenders.
Hi Igor:

The Chevrolet wreck lying in the desert of Egypt was most probably used by the SDF (Sudan Defence Force) but it is not an LRDG truck.

The other Chevrolet shown on your B/W photos was originally used by the Free French. The caption is totally wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-11-11, 15:42
cletrac (RIP)'s Avatar
cletrac (RIP) cletrac (RIP) is offline
David Pope
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eston, Sask, Canada
Posts: 2,249
Default

I'm pretty sure the fenders are all the same basic stamping with different size wheel cutouts. The military fenders look wider because the front bumper is mounted several inches higher than the civvy ones. If you compare the fender width to the number of grille bars they're all the same.
__________________
1940 Cab 11 C8 Wireless with 1A2 box & 11 set
1940 Cab 11 C8 cab and chassis
1940 Cab 11 C15 with 2A1 & Motley mount & Lewis gun
1940 Cab 11 F15A w/ Chev rear ends
1941 Cab 12 F15A
1942-44 Cab 13 F15A x 5
1942 cab 13 F15A with 2B1 box
1943 cab 13 F15A with 2H1 box
1943 Cab 13 C8A HUP
1944 Cab 13 C15A with 2C1 box
1943 Cletrac M2 High Speed Tractor
MkII Bren gun carrier chassis x 2
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-11-11, 23:01
Igor Shadrin Igor Shadrin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thailand
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cletrac View Post
I'm pretty sure the fenders are all the same basic stamping with different size wheel cutouts. The military fenders look wider because the front bumper is mounted several inches higher than the civvy ones. If you compare the fender width to the number of grille bars they're all the same.
David, thanks, I will keep with this point about the width (it is 72 9/6”, for the whole ’41 US built commercial range, acc. to the dealers book).
Although, if to compare the two pics, it is still not clear, even considering the different camera angles.
The side profiles show the significant difference in the aft end location, between LRDG pattern (fwd from the door cut), and the whole commercial range, which had all the same fenders, from pickup to heavy duty trucks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Новый рисунок.jpg (62.2 KB, 59 views)
File Type: jpg 1941 US commercial.jpg (68.5 KB, 60 views)
File Type: jpg 1543x2%20MCP%203ton%204x2%20GMEXK5%20655-221241%20copy - копия.jpg (35.1 KB, 57 views)
File Type: jpg hist4 - копия.jpg (48.0 KB, 56 views)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-11-11, 10:38
cliff's Avatar
cliff cliff is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gympie, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor Shadrin View Post
The side profiles show the significant difference in the aft end location, between LRDG pattern (fwd from the door cut), and the whole commercial range, which had all the same fenders, from pickup to heavy duty trucks.
the door on the closed cab was angled on the hinge side as was the cowl of the closed cab to suit the door. The other LRDG Chev Truck is a 'flat' faced cowl and the area where the door hinges would normally be is straight up and down so this is why the guard ends further forward. The dash was completely different between the Flat Face cowl and closed cab as well.
__________________
Cheers
Cliff Hutchings
aka MrRoo S.I.R.

"and on the 8th day he made trucks so that man, made on the 7th day, had shelter when woman threw him out for the night"
MrRoo says "TRUCKS ROOLE"

Last edited by cliff; 14-11-11 at 10:43.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-11-11, 12:31
Kuno Kuno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Libya... most of the Time
Posts: 536
Default

@ Tony: I actually did not want to suggest that the widening was done by the troops - but I presumed that it was done in local (Egyptian) workshops for the early Chevrolet WA used by the LRDG. So; this was wrong as well - many thanks for that clarification.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-11-11, 19:04
Igor Shadrin Igor Shadrin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thailand
Posts: 18
Default evrica!

Quote:
Originally Posted by cliff View Post
the door on the closed cab was angled on the hinge side as was the cowl of the closed cab to suit the door. The other LRDG Chev Truck is a 'flat' faced cowl and the area where the door hinges would normally be is straight up and down so this is why the guard ends further forward. The dash was completely different between the Flat Face cowl and closed cab as well.
Just today, finally, I cleared the mystery, why fenders do look shorter
Yes, they are the same length, but... higher, or deeper. I outlined the most convenient picture, from the IWM, and mirrored it for more usual direction, and copied the outlined results on another pics. All the same!:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IWM.jpg (50.3 KB, 55 views)
File Type: jpg US chevy1941_новый размер.jpg (82.9 KB, 55 views)

Last edited by Igor Shadrin; 15-11-11 at 20:31.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16-11-11, 04:24
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor Shadrin View Post
I outlined the most convenient picture, from the IWM, ...
While undoubtably the wheel openings are larger, I think the stampings used on the guards are also different. Compare the slope of the front of the guard under the headlight, and also the slope at the very rear of the guard:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Chev guards.jpg (37.3 KB, 46 views)
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13-11-11, 23:06
Igor Shadrin Igor Shadrin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thailand
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuno View Post
Hi Igor:

The Chevrolet wreck lying in the desert of Egypt was most probably used by the SDF (Sudan Defence Force) but it is not an LRDG truck.

The other Chevrolet shown on your B/W photos was originally used by the Free French. The caption is totally wrong.
Hi Kuno,
Many thanks for the important notes!!! Appreciate any information.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 14-11-11, 06:33
Kuno Kuno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Libya... most of the Time
Posts: 536
Default

Igor; the fenders of the trucks used by the LRDG and as well those used by the Free French were widened by approx. 11 cm to accommodate the sand tires. They cut the fenders in the longitudinal direction and added a stripe of sheet metal then.

I have measured it myself at te fender of an LRDG Chevy 30cwt WA at 'Jebel Sherif' and I have seen the same "widenings" at a French wreck and also at the SDF wreck in the Egyptian desert (the one you have presented above).
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 14-11-11, 10:20
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuno View Post
Igor; the fenders of the trucks used by the LRDG and as well those used by the Free French were widened by approx. 11 cm to accommodate the sand tires. They cut the fenders in the longitudinal direction and added a stripe of sheet metal then.

I have measured it myself at the fender of an LRDG Chevy 30cwt WA at 'Jebel Sherif' and I have seen the same "widenings" at a French wreck and also at the SDF wreck in the Egyptian desert (the one you have presented above).
They were widened by 4in (104mm), and it was a factory modification for use with 10.50 wide tyres (on 16", 18" or 20" rims) as per the WD specification, not as your post suggests modified by the troops themselves. I attach two Ford Canada factory pics of a regular C21T cab for 7.50-20 tyres, and an MCP cab, and 2 GM Canada pics of the standard guards for 7.50-20 tyres and the guards for 10.50 tyres.

The spacers to widen the guards are one of the ID hallmarks of an MCP truck.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg e000760753.jpg (63.1 KB, 270 views)
File Type: jpg e000760757.jpg (61.9 KB, 271 views)
File Type: jpg 1543X2 MCP 3TON 4X2 GMEXK1 651-221241.JPG (40.0 KB, 67 views)
File Type: jpg 1543X2 MCP 3TON 4X2.JPG (42.0 KB, 67 views)
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 15-11-11, 19:06
Igor Shadrin Igor Shadrin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thailand
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Smith View Post
They were widened by 4in (104mm), and it was a factory modification for use with 10.50 wide tyres (on 16", 18" or 20" rims) as per the WD specification,
The spacers to widen the guards are one of the ID hallmarks of an MCP truck.
Tony, thanks for detailed description and nice illustrations!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 15-11-11, 18:02
Igor Shadrin Igor Shadrin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thailand
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuno View Post
Igor; the fenders of the trucks used by the LRDG and as well those used by the Free French were widened by approx. 11 cm to accommodate the sand tires. They cut the fenders in the longitudinal direction and added a stripe of sheet metal then.

I have measured it myself at te fender of an LRDG Chevy 30cwt WA at 'Jebel Sherif' and I have seen the same "widenings" at a French wreck and also at the SDF wreck in the Egyptian desert (the one you have presented above).
Kuno, thanks a lot! Now it is clear, the fenders were modified.
10" - were for each side, or totally?

Wish to see these wreckages... Are they too far from any local cities?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 16-11-11, 07:36
Kuno Kuno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Libya... most of the Time
Posts: 536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor Shadrin View Post
10" - were for each side, or totally?
Igor, centimeters - not inch. 10,4cm each side.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17-11-11, 02:15
Igor Shadrin Igor Shadrin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thailand
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuno View Post
Igor, centimeters - not inch. 10,4cm each side.
Kuno, yes, my fault
The total width by fenders is seems to be 80 9/6".
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
16" 8 bolt Split Rims for 1.5 ton Australian Chevrolet Trucks Philippe Jeanneau The Softskin Forum 66 13-08-20 15:17
Other Wheel Options for Early Chevrolet 1.5 ton Trucks... Philippe Jeanneau The Softskin Forum 5 01-07-19 01:42
10 bolt Front Hubs for 1.5 ton Australian Chevrolet Trucks 1940-1945 Philippe Jeanneau The Softskin Forum 0 31-03-19 17:13
1938 Chevrolet 15-cwt G/S trucks David_Hayward (RIP) The Softskin Forum 9 15-09-06 02:44
CC60L Chevrolet Modified Conventional Trucks robbi7 The Softskin Forum 23 14-05-04 14:28


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016