British WW2 10 cwt trailer GS

[Marc van Aalderen]

Originally Posted by David B.

Marc - does it appear to you that the later type hitch is the same as your 10cwt (Lightweight) Trailer.

I would also be curious to know if the same pattern hitch is universally fitted to all 10cwt No2 trailers made by the several different manufacturers.

David,

My hitch looks the same as the later type hitch. I think that these parts were supplied to the trailer builders. Building a trailer from sheet metal is something else compared to casting hitches and turning shafts etc. It would also insure spare parts will always fit.

Cheers,

[David B.]

Hello Marc,

Thanks for the pics - it certainly appears that the hitch assembly was a standardised item probably made by another company and used on the Lightweight Trailer also.

Although SS and Orme Evans seemed to use this assembly on later trailers,Reynolds did not. - Or at least if you look at the pictures of the very tidy Reynolds mortar trailer in the first thread,its a Mk 11 but still uses the original type hitch with the legs still mounted on the draw bar.
The Reynolds design I suppose with the support leg dropping down through the drawbar would prevent the fitting of the later integral hitch assembly- did it change later though ?

What an excellent prospect for restoration your trailer is. I can't add much to your data plate information but I can confirm that the contract S 8055 was listed for trailers numbered X6210183 to X6225182. Where did you get the 1944 date though ?
This contract for 15000 seems to indicate an enormous requirement especially since the previous block of census numbers was for another 2000 made by a firm called Motor Panels. I find it difficult to believe these numbers and wonder if all were delivered.

Anyway I'm still looking for the towing hitch complete and would welcome all leads to find one.

Thanks again,
David.

[Marc van Aalderen]

David,

Your welcome for the pics. Hope they were of some use to you.

One thing is strange regarding the contract number. My WD number is not in the range you mention. X6213775 is nowhere near?
I will keep my eyes and ears open for a complete assy.

Cheers,

[David B.]

Originally Posted by Marc van Aalderen

David,

Your welcome for the pics. Hope they were of some use to you.

One thing is strange regarding the contract number. My WD number is not in the range you mention. X6213775 is nowhere near?
I will keep my eyes and ears open for a complete assy.

Cheers,

Sorry marc - the contract was for X621183 to X6225182. My mental arithmetic can't cope with such big numbers so I've got into the habit of dropping the first number. I've corrected it in the post and as you can see yours does fit.
All the best,
David.