MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20-08-11, 11:24
eddy8men eddy8men is offline
AKA Rick Wedlock
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: manchester
Posts: 715
Default

hi andrew
we're all following your thread with interest and you seem to be cracking on at a blistering pace, at this rate you'll be driving her soon
if you're worried about the tracks then you could remove a link and inspect the pin for wear, a normal used pin would have a stepped wear pattern of maybe 10 thou or so but this is just my guestimation. another method which is actually the official way of track wear testing is to count the links, i don't know how many links a new t16 track has but there will be a figure of so 10 or so less when the track is deemed to be worn out. you'll have to get one of the other t16 guys to give you the correct figures but you can only use that method if the tracks are original and haven't been swapped around with different sections from other vehicles (my tracks are made up from all sorts so the pin is my only guide to track wear)

all the best

rick
__________________
_______________________
1941 mk1 mortar Carrier
1941 Mk1* Carrier
1942 Mk1* Carrier
1943 T16 Carrier
1945 Mk3 Dingo
1941 Mk3 Covenanter
1941 Mk4 Churchill AVRE (now sold)
1944 Mk6 Cromwell (now sold)
1952 Mk3 Centurion
1952 ARV Centurion
1952 ARV Centurion
1953 Mk3 Centurion (breaking)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-08-11, 19:40
andrew honychurch andrew honychurch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kent, Great Britain
Posts: 362
Default

thanks for the advice on the track pin wear. I think they are pretty good to be honest. This T16 was part of a batch that apparently had done very little work, and I think the tracks reflect this. Anyway, got one of the tracks on today, pretty easy with the correct tool. Used the Pin punch to line up the holes and punched it back out with the track pin. Apart from it occurring to me that this is probably a two man job, I seem to have managed ok, except for a crooked neck. I am definitely getting too old for all this!







Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-08-11, 20:39
Alex Blair (RIP) Alex Blair (RIP) is offline
"Mr. Manual", sadly no longer with us
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa ,Canada
Posts: 2,916
Default Fine job..

That is the finest kind of job you are doing on the carrier..The wee lassie will be able to use what you are teaching her for the rest of her life..
My two daughters did and still do do some of the maintenance on their own vehicles ..When they were in their last year of university I bought them each a used car..a Toyota and a Honda Civic..
They would do their own oil changes and my youngest daughter wanted to do EVERYTHING herself,DAD!!!
On her little '83 Honda Civic I wanted to repack the rear wheel bearings ..she wanted to help..we did the first side together and she let the jack down..jacked up the other side and did a fine job of repacking the bearing and putting it all back together..
by herself..thank you..
She is still like that today..
Last year I gave her a new cordless drill and a whack of attachments and this summer I went through my tool boxes and took her down a bunch of new tools that I have no long a use for(Retired Refrigeration mechanic/gas fitter)and my 4 year old grandson immediately latched on to the telescoping mechanics mirror I brought down..
It is his favourite toy..
So you can never start them too young..Keep up the great work dad...

__________________
Alex Blair
:remember :support :drunk:
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-08-11, 02:35
D Ellery's Avatar
D Ellery D Ellery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Mangawhai, New Zealand
Posts: 64
Default

Man that looks good with the tracks back on! well worth blasting the track prior to fitting.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-08-11, 08:59
andrew honychurch andrew honychurch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kent, Great Britain
Posts: 362
Default

Glad you like the tracks, I must say I am pleased with them too. The blaster was desperate to paint them, for two reasons it turned out. First he could not believe that they would look right in bare metal, and then he admitted to me that he had to do a lot more work if they were not going to be covered with black paint afterwards. My father was adamant that they were not painted when he was building them in the early 40s and they certainly look better like this in my opinion . Of course they will tarnish soon and turn back to rust but as long as I can get the old girl running under her own steam it will burnish them up again.

Good story Alex. My girls are taking it all in. They have not yet got to the stage of doing any manual work, but they sit and watch and help with tea and fetching spanners. My youngest did hold a spanner the other side of the hull whilst I tightened a bracket inside, so I suppose we are moving in the right direction. Gee whizz I am stiff today after manhandling that track over the rear drive hub! Since I have put the new seal around the rear drum it makes it very stiff to rotate, hence I had to manuallly lift the track one tooth at a time until I got it in roughly the right position to use the track jack. Now, shall I do the other track today, or can I think of a nice easy job, like cutting some stencils!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-08-11, 18:20
kevin powles's Avatar
kevin powles kevin powles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 1,986
Default Fine Work.

Andrew,
I must say I had no real iterest in T16 Carriers until reading your thread, You are doing a thourgh job there. The track looks good with very little wear on the pads. If the track is worn on the pins or pin holes what you will find is they will not sit square on the sprockets/front idlers and you will get wheel scrub on the inner side of the rear trailing wheel, The sprockets will burr over in time too, but from what I can see your track looks good. I was going to get some track shot blasted but thought it might suffer in getting grit trapped in the pins?. Keep posting the large scale pictures.

Kevin.
__________________
2pdr Tank Hunter Universal Carrier 1942 registered 11/11/2008.
3" Mortar Universal Carrier 1943 registered 06/06/2009.
1941 Standard Mk1 stowage Carrier, Caunter camo.
1941 Standard Mk1 stowage Carrier, light stone.
10 cwt wartime mortar trailer.
1943 Mk2 Daimler Dingo.
1943 Willys MB.
1936 Vickers MG carrier No1 Mk1 CMM 985.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-08-11, 18:42
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,068
Default

must admit that was what stopped me doing mine... but suppose if you take the time to clear it all out of the lugs etc it should be ok.

Tis looking good though Andrew... i would not worry about the pitting on the lower hull......its honest...it is what it is (Original !)
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 13:42.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016