![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
note to self....MUST TYPE BETTER!
Try www.daimler-fighting-vehicles.co.uk I dont want to post them here, because they are very much a work in progress, but i am typing up all of the Bovington Tank museum records related to Dingo's (its taken two years so far!) of the early cars (those issued before dunkirk) there are at least 50 or so cars issued to rifle brigades or other infantry units that do not spring to mind as being associated with the recce corps and were not part of the RAC at that time. examples are 1st Queen Victoria Rifles. As part of the BEF 2nd Queen Victoria Rifles. (latter KRRC) 2nd Kings Royal Rifle Corps as part of the BEF 1940. 2nd Kings Own Royal Rifle Corps. 12th Kings Royal Rifle Corps 1st Rifle Brigade as part of the BEF 1940 7th Rifle Brigade 8th Rifle Brigade 5th Loyals 2nd Tower Hamlets 1st Rangers 2nd Rangers 1st Queens Westminster 1st London rifle Brigade 1st Motor MG Brigade 1st Guards Grenadier Guards 4th Coldstream Guards 2nd Irish Guards plus 1st Field Squadron Royal Engineers 9th Field Royal Engineers 10th Field Royal Engineers 11th Field Royal Engineers 12th Field Royal Engineers 13th Field Royal Engineers getting photographioc evidence is hard due to the lack of recognisable markings on cars used by the above regiments, however on my site you will find captioned photo's from the IWM and other sources that give the unit recorded at the time the photo was taken. hope this helps singe Last edited by singeager; 05-04-11 at 23:11. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Singe
Thanks for the information. The Reccy Corps did not exist at the time of Dunkirk and the Dingo was the only Scout Car in production at the time so they had no choice if a vehicle was required. The Carrier Platoon is meant to be the main Reccy vehicle in an infantry battalion so any thing else is normally associated with liaison duties rather than true reconnaissance. Hence why for these subsidiary duties Humber Scout Cars, or Light Reconnaissance Cars (Humber and Morris) appear a lot more regularly in photographs. Some of the assault Division destined for the first wave on D Day were also equipped to a different scale to other divisions. It would be nice to see some more photographic evidence to stand along side the pictures of other vehicles in use but if clearly it does not exist. Obviously don't take as Gospel any captioned photograph without good supporting evidence. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
If on my site i have given a IWM or other reference number then be assured that the description is exactly what the historic records state. That said, ive found many errors for example... Morris gun tractor (quads) being referred to as Armoured vehicles! Locations being incorrectly stated ( I have modern photos' of the same locations and unless the buildings moved to the next village then there is no explanation except the caption is incorrect). Where in doubt or a matter of conjecture you will see the words ‘reputedly’, ‘possibly’ etc in any description stated. Its very difficult to be accurate over 65 years after the event, Stuart Hills states in his book that he drove a Humber scout car named ‘Hurstwood’. On a web site for his particular regiment someone has posted two photos of a Dingo with the words ‘HUSRTWOOD’ painted across the front of it in big letters. So was it a Humber, or was it a Dingo incorrectly remembered? We can only try our best to record what there is before those who witnessed it first-hand are gone. singe |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|