MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23-07-10, 16:27
Phil Waterman Phil Waterman is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Temple, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 3,929
Default Didn't one of the Scandinavian Country's do this as standard conversion.

I remember seeing something like this on a web site showing this type of conversion as standard, memory says Norway. Don't remember seeing a reason for the conversion but it might have been along the lines of making all special use vehicles look like standard cargo types to reduce their attractiveness as targets.

Cheers Phil
__________________
Phil Waterman
`41 C60L Pattern 12
`42 C60S Radio Pattern 13
`45 HUP
http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/
New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-07-10, 16:51
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default Another possible explanation...

If they had converted the artillery towing role to heavier trucks with more ammunition storage capacity (as many countries did) they might have seen the opportunity to recycle a group of trucks that had remaining useful life...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Waterman View Post
I remember seeing something like this on a web site showing this type of conversion as standard, memory says Norway. Don't remember seeing a reason for the conversion but it might have been along the lines of making all special use vehicles look like standard cargo types to reduce their attractiveness as targets.

Cheers Phil
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-07-10, 16:56
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,862
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Waterman View Post
I remember seeing something like this on a web site showing this type of conversion as standard, memory says Norway. Don't remember seeing a reason for the conversion but it might have been along the lines of making all special use vehicles look like standard cargo types to reduce their attractiveness as targets.
See Interesting CGT for some pictures of the Danish Army CGT conversion and the reason why they converted it. The CGT advertised here is featured in that thread, too.

Having a closer look at the picture above I can only conclude the person who restored it fabricated a cargo box, probably because that was easier to do than refabricating the FAT rear body which must have been missing like on many if not most FATs.

H.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-07-10, 00:33
Larry Hayward Larry Hayward is offline
MVT Member 11001
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Middlesex
Posts: 401
Default Dannish CMP

Hanno,

I think you are right - even the seem round the cab is shown on the Danish version and the rear tub too.
__________________
Larry Hayward
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-07-10, 01:16
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

The photos of the Danish conversions seem to have bodies of two patterns, resembling cut down CCKW bodies or regular CMP 15 cwt bodies. I didn't see any with the rounded mudguards under the body tray seen here, except for the image that seems to be of the truck discussed here.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-07-10, 15:49
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,862
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hayward View Post
I think you are right - even the seem round the cab is shown on the Danish version and the rear tub too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant Bowker View Post
The photos of the Danish conversions seem to have bodies of two patterns, resembling cut down CCKW bodies or regular CMP 15 cwt bodies. I didn't see any with the rounded mudguards under the body tray seen here, except for the image that seems to be of the truck discussed here.
Larry, Grant,

Indeed the Danish Army CGT conversion made use of a body patterned on the Amercian cargo body, possibly modified from surplus ones.



Like I said, the CGT advertised above is fitted with fabricated a cargo box, probably because that was easier to do than refabricating the FAT rear body which must have been missing like on many if not most surviving FATs.

Hanno
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-07-10, 19:50
Eastblock Eastblock is offline
Michael Henriksen
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 19
Default

I emailed the seller asking for information about the box but I guess he can't be bothered to answer. The Danish ones look like they sit up closer to the cab.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-07-10, 20:06
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,862
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastblock View Post
I emailed the seller asking for information about the box but I guess he can't be bothered to answer. The Danish ones look like they sit up closer to the cab.
Indeed, the Danish conversion does not have a spare wheel mount in between the cab and the cargo box.

So the answer to Larry's initial question is: this is a CMP Chevrolet CGT 1944 13 Cab fitted with fabricated a cargo box which makes it look like a GS 15 cwt on 20-in wheels. It might be the perfect truck for someone to run as such or fabricate a proper FAT rear body - this has been done before.

H.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:28.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016