![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wheeled armoured vehicles
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Cheers
__________________
Mark |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mark, I don't want to hijack Randall's thread but I wonder if you could help me? I see you will be at BBBBBQ and I would like to ask you about C15TA's. Who all could have used them etc. I would like to change the markings on mine and could use some help in deciding. I don't even know what regiment the current markings are. Stefan researched them and put them on. I am not unhappy with them but I really don't like the number CZ4288013 It comes from my superstitious Irish grandmother. Hope to see you Saturday.
Cheers, Barry
__________________
Every twenty minute job is one broken bolt away from a three day ordeal. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
... and here I thought I was attending a BBQ and didn’t have to work ... ![]() To answer your second question, your current markings are those of the 18th Armoured Car Regiment (12th Manitoba Dragoons), C.A.C. (II Cdn Corps Troops) and in answer to your first question, I’ll bring along Cdn user unit info for the C15TA, Truck, 15-cwt, Armoured, 4x4. One unit you may want to mark it up as belonging to is the 1st Canadian Armoured Carrier Regiment, C.A.C. (Kangaroos) ... ![]() See you on the weekend ... oh, and I’ll bring along the invoice for my research ... ![]() Cheers
__________________
Mark |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think that is what James Gosling's truck is marked as and it sure stands out. The kangaroo on the door really sets it off nicely. Perhaps I could pay you off with Gilles burgers and beer. ![]() Cheers, Barry
__________________
Every twenty minute job is one broken bolt away from a three day ordeal. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://web.archive.org/web/200602150...hq/cmhq141.pdf Humber Mk.IV Armoured cars were replaced by Daimlier Armoured Cars in October 1944. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
What is the marking in the centre front? It looks like the British 79th armoured div (Bulls Head) ( Hobarts Funnies). Ron
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I’m not really sure what you are trying to say, but ... The designation I used for the White Motor Company built American CAR, SCOUT, M3A1, 4x4 of 'Truck, 15-cwt, Armoured, 4x4' in response to Bruce Parker’s question is the designation that appears in both the War Establishment for ‘A Reconnaissance Regiment, C.A.C.’ - Cdn II/251/2 (effective 21 February 1944) and in the VEHICLE DATA BOOK, Canadian Army Overseas (Pubs 167 40/P & S/2978 (6681)) that was published under direction of The Branch of the Quartermaster-General, Canadian Military Headquarters (London) in March 1944, although in this publication the designation 'Truck, 15-cwt, Armoured, 4x4' is followed in brackets by: (M3A1, 15-cwt, 4x4, 131 wb). In this same publication, the General Motors built C15TA (vehicle Code: C15TA-ARMD-1) is also given the designation of 'Truck, 15-cwt, Armoured, 4x4' and is followed in brackets by: (15-cwt, 4x4, 101 wb), but as we know, the C15TA didn’t start to arrive in the UK until May 1944, with only 21 having been issued to units of the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division by month’s end. In regards to Half-tracks, in the above mentioned publication and in subsequent Canadian WE’s that I’ve seen, Half-tracks bare the simple designation of ‘Truck, 15-cwt, Half-track’ regardless of their task, except for instances of if fitted for wireless, they appear as ‘Truck, 15-cwt, Half-track, FFW’. In my original response to Randy’s question, maybe I should not have used the leading words: “The vehicles used by the 7th Reconnaissance Regiment (17th Duke of York's Royal Canadian Hussars), C.A.C. of the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division ...”, but instead said “That to give you an idea of what vehicles the 7th Reconnaissance Regiment (17th Duke of York's Royal Canadian Hussars), C.A.C. of the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division may have been equipped with, the following is the vehicle portion of the War Establishment for ‘A Reconnaissance Regiment, C.A.C.’ (Cdn. II/251/2 - effective 21 February 1944), which is the War Establishment their issue of vehicles would have been based on for comparison to what the Trux site states was the British War Establishment for a Reconnaissance Regiment (WE II/251/2 - effective December 1943) ...”. I should also maybe have explained in my original post the difference between what the WE of ‘A Reconnaissance Regiment, C.A.C.’ (Cdn. II/251/2) stated was to be the scale of transport issue and what the units sometimes received in lieu of. I merely quoted the scale of transport issue as called for under the War Establishment for ‘A Reconnaissance Regiment, C.A.C.’ (Cdn. II/251/2) that was authorized at the time that the WE came into effect (12 Feb 44), for the ‘Divisional Reconnaissance Regiment’ of both the 2nd and 3rd Canadian Infantry Divisions (14th Canadian Hussars and the 17th Duke of York's Royal Canadian Hussars, respectively). Cheers
__________________
Mark |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Cheers
__________________
Mark Last edited by Mark W. Tonner; 23-06-10 at 19:10. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|