MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-10, 14:41
chalky's Avatar
chalky chalky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 78
Default

Whats the story with the WOC1 . They were built in Britain but why did Ford UK use the American front end .
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-06-10, 16:27
Ian McCallum's Avatar
Ian McCallum Ian McCallum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Suffolk, England
Posts: 193
Default Potted history - Why the American front end?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalky View Post
Whats the story with the WOC1 . They were built in Britain but why did Ford UK use the American front end .
Hi Chalky, You are quite correct re the front end and hopefully this will explain why. Late in 1939 Ford at Dagenham submitted a prototype to the War Office for evaluation, which due to the urgency was approved within two weeks! The design was based on a modified American commercial Model 01C chassis that was already being imported and bodied in the UK for our commercial needs. The 'cobbled' submission was designated WOC1 (WO for War Office, C for Commercial and 1 for first type). This incorporated the imported chassis and as far forward as the bulkhead was largely identical to the standard commercial model. It had the American lockhead hydraulic braking system, not to be seen on many lighter UK Ford models until post war and was fitted with the British 21 stud V8 engine. This was fitted with an open cab manufactured by Briggs Motor Bodies and the only stipulation was that the chassis had to accept a standard War Office pattern 8 cwt. well type body, (as also fitted to a Humber and Morris) variant. The first order was placed in October 1939 under contract V3615 for 1000 vehicles, followed by contract V3730 for a further 1000 vehicles on 17th. November. Due to America 'going neutral' during this period some components initally came through Ford Canada although quantity production of the chassis commenced at Dagenham on 20th. December 1939 with all vehicles being delivered by 24th. July 1940 and no further orders being placed. My vehicle retains its original number of Z4128683 which was the 489'th vehicle off the line within the first contract of 1000.

Ian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-11, 21:07
Rich Payne Rich Payne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Limburg, Belgium
Posts: 278
Default

I've never seen evidence of WOC1s captured in france being used by the Wehrmacht but a current ebay auction shows that they must have had at least two. The pictures are captioned on the reverse as 'Concarneau' (Brittany)

Presumably converted to FFW ?



Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-08-11, 22:55
Alex van de Wetering Alex van de Wetering is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
Posts: 2,767
Default

Interesting pictures Ron, especially with that Wireless frame. There is another pic of a WOC in Wehrmacht service in Jochen Vollerts book "Britische LKW im Dienste der Whrmacht" as well. Will try to scan the picture in the next few days.

Alex
__________________
Chevrolet C8 cab 11 FFW
BSA Folding Bicycle
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-08-11, 16:35
Alex van de Wetering Alex van de Wetering is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
Posts: 2,767
Default

Scanned from: "Britische LKW im Dienst der Wehrmacht" Jochen Vollert, Tankograd
Attached Images
File Type: jpg WOC1.jpg (77.1 KB, 52 views)
__________________
Chevrolet C8 cab 11 FFW
BSA Folding Bicycle
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-09-11, 20:32
Rich Payne Rich Payne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Limburg, Belgium
Posts: 278
Default Another abandoned WOC1

This looks to be close to the church of St. Eloi in Dunkirk, near to where I photographed Ian's truck. In fact, I think that he drove along here.



I can't see a formation sign but there appears to be an unreadable AoS plate. I wonder if the lack of formation sign on all these WOC1s is because they were used by GHQ and there was never a BEF GHQ formation sign, the only clue being the bar on the usually missing AoS plate ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-09-11, 21:27
Ian McCallum's Avatar
Ian McCallum Ian McCallum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Suffolk, England
Posts: 193
Default And Whats behind it?

Rich,

Where do you manage to find all these great shots, certainly recognise the church, just can't quite figure ourt the orientation without checking a street plan.

Are my eyes playing tricks or is there another vehicle behind the WOC? You can quite easily define the cab and rear tilt frame devoid of any canvas but there also appears to be another 'tilted' vehicle beyond it. Also interesting as this is the first photo I have seen of the bridge plate painted in this position.

Ian
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dunkirk Ed Storey WW2 Military History & Equipment 45 31-08-17 12:01
Quad at Dunkirk photo Ryan The Softskin Forum 1 04-02-12 23:36
Filmset - Dunkirk Noel Burgess The Softskin Forum 13 28-09-08 23:22
Dunkirk Morris CS8 ? Mike K The Softskin Forum 2 05-05-08 21:28
Registration & Benefits Geoff Winnington-Ball (RIP) TAC HQ 13 21-05-05 03:25


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016