MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Gun Park

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-10-08, 14:49
Gerry McGinty Gerry McGinty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Largs, Ayrshire, Scotland
Posts: 29
Default

I know this will be more tantalising than helpful but a couple of years ago, I found a similar photo showing US army personnel using 25 pounders and trawled the internet for answers.
Now my first thought was that it started a thread on MLU but I have searched and can find nothing so it must have been on some other forum.
I kept all the replies in a file which unfortunately was lost in a major computer crash.
So much for being unhelpful, the tantalising bit is that a couple of replies stated that the US army did, in a small way, use the 25 pdr. and even quoted battery numbers. I think (could be wrong - usually I am) that the reason quoted was that there was a sudden shortage of ammo. for the 105mms. and that as a temporary measure the British guns were loaned to the Americans.
I apologise for being so vague but I would love to rediscover the truth behind all this.
Best regards
Gerry McGinty
__________________
Gerry
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-10-08, 15:32
Geoff Winnington-Ball (RIP)'s Avatar
Geoff Winnington-Ball (RIP) Geoff Winnington-Ball (RIP) is offline
former OC MLU, AKA 'Jif' - sadly no longer with us
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerry McGinty View Post
So much for being unhelpful, the tantalising bit is that a couple of replies stated that the US army did, in a small way, use the 25 pdr. and even quoted battery numbers. I think (could be wrong - usually I am) that the reason quoted was that there was a sudden shortage of ammo. for the 105mms. and that as a temporary measure the British guns were loaned to the Americans.
Now that you mention that, I seem to recall something in that vein myself, but can't for the life of me remember where it was or the details!!
__________________
SUNRAY SENDS AND ENDS
:remember :support
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-10-08, 17:49
Mark W. Tonner's Avatar
Mark W. Tonner Mark W. Tonner is offline
Senior Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London, Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 3,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerry McGinty View Post
that the reason quoted was that there was a sudden shortage of ammo. for the 105mms. and that as a temporary measure the British guns were loaned to the Americans.
Hi Gerry;

The shortage of 105mm howitzer ammunition started as early as Normandy and plagued the Americans late into 1944. This was brought about by both problems with manufacture in the United States and shipment overseas and by problems of cross channel supply and logistics within the United States Com Zone ETOUSA on the continent itself. There were restrictions placed on the use of 105mm howitzer ammunition (ie. X number of rounds per) until the supply situation was sorted out, but I haven’t come across anything that even suggested that 25 pounders were lent or issued to the Americans (and it may be, that I myself just haven’t come across this information yet, but I find it odd that 25pdrs would be lent or issued to American artillery batteries in North West Europe). The American batteries themselves, due to shortages and restrictions on the amount of 105mm howitzer ammunition they could fire, supplemented their firepower by the use of captured field pieces and ammunition during this time.

Cheers
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-10-08, 20:49
bram risseeuw bram risseeuw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ireland
Posts: 7
Default american artillery

US field Artillery of World War II by Steven J Zaloga pages 36/37:
Quote:
Following the heavy losses of US equipment in the Ardennes during the Battle of the Bulge, Britain loaned 100 25-pdrs and 300,000 rounds of ammunition to temporarily equip US field artillery battalions until additional supplies arrived from the United States. Many of these were used in batallions of the US Ninth Army, which at the time was attached to Montgommery's 21st Army Group.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-10-08, 22:30
Gerry McGinty Gerry McGinty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Largs, Ayrshire, Scotland
Posts: 29
Smile

Hi Bram
Thank you for your reply. Is that an Osprey book?
I still can't remember where I read this info. or saw the picture I mentioned but pehaps it was browsing through a book in a shop because I have many Osprey books but not this one.
However, again thanks - you are helping me get to the bottom of this which has been bugging me for ages.
Best regards
Gerry
__________________
Gerry
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-10-08, 22:56
Mark W. Tonner's Avatar
Mark W. Tonner Mark W. Tonner is offline
Senior Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London, Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 3,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bram risseeuw View Post
US field Artillery of World War II by Steven J Zaloga pages 36/37:
I'm surprised that not even the volume dealing with the Ardennes in the OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF MILITARY HISTORY, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 'Official History' series of the UNITED STATES ARMY IN WORLD WAR II - The European Theater of Operations - THE ARDENNES: BATTLE OF THE BULGE - by: Hugh M. Cole, published by: OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF MILITARY HISTORY, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, WASHINGTON, D.C., 1965, or any of the other volumes of the above mentioned make any reference to "Britain loaned 100 25-pdrs and 300,000 rounds of ammunition to temporarily equip US field artillery battalions until additional supplies arrived from the United States. Many of these were used in batallions of the US Ninth Army..."

Cheers
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-10-08, 23:37
bram risseeuw bram risseeuw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ireland
Posts: 7
Default american artillery

Hi Gerry,

yes it is an Osprey book: New Vanguard 131

I seems Mark W Tonner has his doubts, but Steven J Zaloga is most of the time very well informed and official publications are not always as complete or correct as they pretend.
An example are the official lists of the "Quantities of Lend-Lease Shipments"
I can not find deliveries of 105 mm howitzers on those lists, while I know for sure a lot were delivered by lend-lease.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-10-08, 00:24
Mark W. Tonner's Avatar
Mark W. Tonner Mark W. Tonner is offline
Senior Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London, Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 3,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bram risseeuw View Post
Hi Gerry,

yes it is an Osprey book: New Vanguard 131

I seems Mark W Tonner has his doubts, but Steven J Zaloga is most of the time very well informed and official publications are not always as complete or correct as they pretend.
An example are the official lists of the "Quantities of Lend-Lease Shipments"
I can not find deliveries of 105 mm howitzers on those lists, while I know for sure a lot were delivered by lend-lease.
I have no doubts as to Steve Zaloga's findings and I am well aware that 'official publications' sometimes leave much to be desired, I just merely meant that I find it surprising that the supply of 25 pounders to Americans has never popped up before in anything that I've read or studied.

Cheers
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-10-08, 01:05
bram risseeuw bram risseeuw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ireland
Posts: 7
Default

Sorry Mark I got the wrong impression, no hard feelings I hope.
By the way do you have the figures of the lend-lease 105 mm howitzers M2A1What I know: UK 16, China 476, France 239, Latin America 223 (figures same book as before). My question: how many 105 mm howitzers were delivered to the different Latin American countries (105 mm ammunition was delivered to Brazil, Chile, Guatemala, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela).
Also 18 105 mm M3 howitzers were delivered to Brazil.

Cheers,
Bram
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 21:07.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016