MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18-07-08, 17:38
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default Contract or Demand?

I know that Supply Mechanical contracts were officially 'Demands'. I would suspect that 'S.' ones were from the Ministry of Supply and may also have been 'Demands'.

The series of S/M contracts (I can't call them Demands) seems to have run in series as we discussed previously:

S/M 1001 and up (e.g. Staghounds so armoured?)
S/M 2002 and up.. I have no evidence that there was a 2001 actually placed
S/M 3001 and up (possibly trailers and spare parts?)
S/M 4001 and up ??
S/M 5001 and up ??
S/M 6001 and up (overflow from 2xxx series I think)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-07-08, 23:08
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David_Hayward View Post
I know that Supply Mechanical contracts were officially 'Demands'. I would suspect that 'S.' ones were from the Ministry of Supply and may also have been 'Demands'.
My F15A was built under contract "CD 1513"; I have been told "CD" stood for "Contract Demand"?

H.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-07-08, 10:29
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default Cd

Isn't that FULLY C.D.L.V., which stood for Contract Demand Land Vehicles?

To confuse the Ministry of Supply placed Demands overseas for CMPs under the S/M 2XXX series and then the actual contracts for assembly at Dagenham, and probably also other plants, had a 'V.XXXX' series one allocated. This was the domestic series. No doubt rebuilds had the same subsequently.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-07-08, 12:03
rewdco's Avatar
rewdco rewdco is offline
Jan Vandevelde
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bruges, Belgium
Posts: 78
Default "contract" numbers...

Quote:
Originally Posted by David_Hayward View Post
Isn't that FULLY C.D.L.V., which stood for Contract Demand Land Vehicles?

To confuse the Ministry of Supply placed Demands overseas for CMPs under the S/M 2XXX series and then the actual contracts for assembly at Dagenham, and probably also other plants, had a 'V.XXXX' series one allocated. This was the domestic series. No doubt rebuilds had the same subsequently.
Dave,

Indeed, we had a similar case in this thread: http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/sh...ghlight=ec018q
But correct me if I'm wrong: I did find the S/M 2019 reference in the Chilwell list (census numbers L773980 onwards), but couldn't find the domestic V4288...

Regards,
Jan
Attached Images
File Type: jpg SM2019_1.jpg (21.9 KB, 30 views)
__________________
"And now it's your turn to get up off that couch and go into the deserts, go into the mountains, go under the lakes, rivers, and seas and search for history. You'll never find a more rewarding adventure!" (Clive Cussler)

1940 Royal Enfield WD/C
1942 Royal Enfield WD/CO
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-07-08, 23:14
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default V. contracts

I never cease to be amazed at a) how I forget about previous threads and b) how some 'ferrets' seem to be able to find them and drag them up! Thanks for that one, Sir!

The answer lies in the case of Fords in the 1942 Dagenham Ford civvy and military guide booklet which had details of models (and drawings) plus details in some cases of both Demands and Contracts. I just wish I had a GM Ltd version!

This is my complete list:
S/M 2004 EC098TFS (3-ton 158" w.b. 4 x 2 ) assembled under Contract 294/V/4214
S/M 2019 EC108Q assembled under Contract 294/V/4288
S/M 2020 EC011QF assembled under Contract [294/]V/4513
S/M 2030 EC011DF assembled under Contract 294/V/4699
S/M 2037 EC018Q assembled under Contract 294/VS/4784
S/M 2046 EC098UFS (3-ton Tipping) assembled under Contract [294/]V/4596
S/M 2048 EC196TFS for Canadian Forestry Corps (3 ton 176" w.b.) assembled under Contract 294/V/4629
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-07-08, 22:12
rewdco's Avatar
rewdco rewdco is offline
Jan Vandevelde
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bruges, Belgium
Posts: 78
Default more mysterious prefixes...

David,

I've been studying the contract plates for a while and have "discovered" this:

At the beginning of the war, these contract plates were made of brass. They contained the following information: contract number (starting with the previously mentioned T or C or V prefixes) and spare parts catalogue reference number.

From somewhere around 1943, the contract plates were made of sheet steel, and from more or less the same date onwards, the contract number was preceded by an additional prefix "294/contract number". At least for the motorcycle contracts, there was also a number 23 in this prefix: "294/23/contract number". I know from contemporary documents that this 294/23 prefix has been in use since the start of the war. But does anybody know what it stands for?

Regards,
Jan
__________________
"And now it's your turn to get up off that couch and go into the deserts, go into the mountains, go under the lakes, rivers, and seas and search for history. You'll never find a more rewarding adventure!" (Clive Cussler)

1940 Royal Enfield WD/C
1942 Royal Enfield WD/CO
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-07-08, 11:25
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default Theory

I am conjecting at the moment that the War Office then Ministry of Supply had written Volumes with different contract types, If that was the case, perhaps '243' was the Volume or series for vehicles, or wheeled vehicles, then the next was a sub-series, followed by a sequential number which started probably post-Great War...it seems that by the early 1930s they had got to V.2400 or so, and they just added as each contract was let? I know that the 'V.' series ran into the 5000s, but whether the 'T.' and 'S.' series used the same numbers I have no definitive proof but the evidence that I have suggests that they were a seperate series.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What it means the letters "CKD" M38CDNBill The Softskin Forum 5 20-07-14 14:38


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016