Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanno Spoelstra
In this case it, is vital to state that the designation "1945 C291Q.L-W Lorry, 30cwt, 4x4, Water" you have labelled the above photos with, is your own interpretation of what "C291Q.L-W" stands for.
|
Hanno the designation “Lorry, 30cwt, 4x4, Water” was provided by Lauren Child, not me. It appears on the C291Q.L-W contract card reported by Lauren three years ago. Also the late Peter Ford had previously explained the “L” suffix, as quoted on your very own “F22” webpage: “Which brings us to the ".L". Simply stated, this was the end user's way of telling us that the truck was a Lorry version of a C291Q.” Hanno I’m at a loss to understand why you continue to ignore the official Ford designation in favour of Brian Nunn’s false and misleading “F22” designation. Putting it in quotation marks renders it no less false or misleading, especially with constant repetition over nearly two decades via your “F22” webpage. Personally I’m anxious to dissociate myself from Brian’s false and misleading “F22” designation and any promotion of his rebodied vehicle as an originally configured “winchless FAT”. There are laws against falsifying vehicle provenance and promoting it to unsuspecting buyers. Brian’s “F22 winchless FAT” myth may have started innocently enough, but now that we have Lauren’s contract card information we can no longer plead ignorance. It’s no skin off my nose but I think you’d be wise to update your webpage to reflect this information.
Hanno I've posted this message verbatim on Keith's Facebook page to avoid potential confusion. Cheers, Tony.