MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old 26-04-16, 10:35
David Herbert David Herbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland - previously Suffolk
Posts: 563
Default

Don't forget that most Jumbos were not conversions of existing tanks but were built new as M4 A3 E2 standard. However, as far as possible existing designs of components were used so that design and tooling work were minimised. Where it was easy to not drill a hole or weld a piece on (like the provision for the headlight sockets) they took the opportunity but if they were short of a particular piece (the simplified glacis plate here) it might well have been easier to use a standard one to avoid waiting for a delivery. They might easily have had to take part built hull fabrications that were intended to be standard M4A3 off the main production line and finnish them as M4A3E2 hulls.

David
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
19 set in Sherman DanJahn The Wireless Forum 3 08-02-15 01:39
Sherman ARV Mk.I Dave Block The Armour Forum 11 02-11-12 01:08
1H Sherman V DD Tony Viste The Armour Forum 0 13-12-08 02:56
M4A3E2 walkaround Bob Cohoon The Armour Forum 0 30-08-07 00:08
Re: Sherman Ic Chris Johnson The Armour Forum 27 20-04-05 11:50


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016