MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old 07-07-16, 22:18
mlombard mlombard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 62
Default

Hi

So what was the reason for 9.25 x 16 versus 9.00 x 16 surely when they were trying to keep rubber use to a minimum one tyre would have been easier to produce, Was it something to do with weight carrying capacity, they were both off road tyres right, so there would have been no need for different performance characteristics surely. Was it something to do with the 'run flat' requirement on armoured cars etc.

regards

Matt
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
9.00-16 Tyres...... Monkey Man Post-war Military Vehicles 3 07-03-13 12:20
12:00-20 tyres Harry Moon The Restoration Forum 6 14-12-12 06:25
10.00 X 20 tyres Robin Craig Post-war Military Vehicles 5 12-11-12 14:47
900 x 13 Tyres Lynx45 The Gun Park 15 07-09-07 03:32
Want some tyres?? Bill Murray The Softskin Forum 10 13-02-06 10:58


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 13:57.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016