MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22-04-12, 22:11
kevin powles's Avatar
kevin powles kevin powles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 1,984
Default head gasket problem

Hi, Took the carrier to a local show today, on returning from a 2 mile run, I was getting alot of gurgaling from the expansion tank and the radiator cap joints started passing steam.

The engine I have in the carrier is a 24 stud 8BA which came in the carrier when I got it and has given 5 years reliable service. She has always run a little hot and top radiator temp was 125 degrees C on shutting down, (hotter than normal).

I am going to do a compression check on the piston bores and coolant system this week, can anyone tell me what peek pressure can I expect on a healthy bore, I have yet to check condition of the oil. I did fire up my CO meter but its a bit old and unreliable and did indicate CO with radiator cap removed and the engine not running.

I am hoping this is a head gasket failure and not a cracked block, I think the radiator relief valve is working correctly as i have overhauled it previously, Head gasket change on these looks very straight forward but I am open to any ideas or comments.

kev.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg transport2012 011.jpg (56.9 KB, 49 views)
__________________
2pdr Tank Hunter Universal Carrier 1942 registered 11/11/2008.
3" Mortar Universal Carrier 1943 registered 06/06/2009.
1941 Standard Mk1 stowage Carrier, Caunter camo.
1941 Standard Mk1 stowage Carrier, light stone.
10 cwt wartime mortar trailer.
1943 Mk2 Daimler Dingo.
1943 Willys MB.
1936 Vickers MG carrier No1 Mk1 CMM 985.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-04-12, 23:17
Stew Robertson Stew Robertson is offline
Staghound
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rockwood, ON, Canada
Posts: 268
Default

Hi Kevin
take the rad cap OFF and run the engine until it comes up to nomal operating temperature then watch in the rad opening and rev the engine to check for bubbles nine times out of ten of there is bubbles, you have valve seat / wall cracks a typical overheated ford flat head issue
Stew
P.S while the engine is warming up also check the rad for bubbles, if they are
there before it gets warmed up it is probabley just the gaskets
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-04-12, 21:28
carrierbarry carrierbarry is offline
Barry
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Watford, London
Posts: 216
Default Sad

Thats a sad sight !!!

Hope everything is ok


Barry
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-04-12, 15:59
kevin powles's Avatar
kevin powles kevin powles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 1,984
Default

Hi, Had the engine cover off today, turns out the fan belt was sherreded, got a new one on for £13, overhauled the cap, changed the oil and coolant. Now running as before, lucky escape and I would advise any carrier owner to check your fan belt condition and it is the correct one, also carry a spare.

kev.
__________________
2pdr Tank Hunter Universal Carrier 1942 registered 11/11/2008.
3" Mortar Universal Carrier 1943 registered 06/06/2009.
1941 Standard Mk1 stowage Carrier, Caunter camo.
1941 Standard Mk1 stowage Carrier, light stone.
10 cwt wartime mortar trailer.
1943 Mk2 Daimler Dingo.
1943 Willys MB.
1936 Vickers MG carrier No1 Mk1 CMM 985.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-04-12, 17:53
charlie fitton's Avatar
charlie fitton charlie fitton is offline
HLIofC - Normandy Pl
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Maryhill Ontario
Posts: 943
Default .

[QUOTE=kevin powles; turns out the fan belt was sherreded,

Hi Kev

Should be "belts" - and check your water pumps to see if they are the cause of the shredding..

Took me forever to figure out that the left pump would sieze "every now and then" - didn't leak, or even squeal all the time.

Dead simple rebuild.

f
__________________
Charles Fitton
Maryhill On.,
Canada

too many carriers
too many rovers
not enough time.
(and now a BSA...)
(and now a Triumph TRW...)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-04-12, 18:50
ajmac's Avatar
ajmac ajmac is offline
Alastair McMurray
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 434
Default

I remember kev said he has an 8ba fitted, if it is original condition then it only has provision for one belt, has it got the distributor up top by the RH cylinder bank kev?

Glad you sorted it...I have just started my 81a 3.6L 24 stud rebuild and all I can say is flatheads are not easy to work on when they have some carbon and corrosion in them!
__________________
Alastair
Lincoln, UK.


Under Restoration:
1944 No2 MK2 Loyd Carrier - Tracked Towing
1944 Ford WOT6 Lorry


The Loyd on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-04-12, 18:52
kevin powles's Avatar
kevin powles kevin powles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 1,984
Default

Hi Charlie, Only one belt on my carrier as its an 8ba with single pulley on the pumps, Carriers run two belts to make them more reliable?, Cant see a difference in loading between a carrier and ford pilot or mecury, any one know why military spec is two belts~?.

kev.
__________________
2pdr Tank Hunter Universal Carrier 1942 registered 11/11/2008.
3" Mortar Universal Carrier 1943 registered 06/06/2009.
1941 Standard Mk1 stowage Carrier, Caunter camo.
1941 Standard Mk1 stowage Carrier, light stone.
10 cwt wartime mortar trailer.
1943 Mk2 Daimler Dingo.
1943 Willys MB.
1936 Vickers MG carrier No1 Mk1 CMM 985.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-04-12, 19:05
ajmac's Avatar
ajmac ajmac is offline
Alastair McMurray
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 434
Default

Think we cross posted there!
As far as I know twin belts were specified for trucks and single for cars in the US, over in England we were more reserved and retained twin belts throughout flathead production into the 50s. In my view twin belts were for reliability and during wartime when flatheads began to be supplied from the US and Canada, the British spec simply followed what they were procuring from Dagenham. Hence the twin belts and the British reluctance to move to the 239ci.... I am still sure that British built carriers never deviated from the 221ci, T16s and from people say Canadian carriers both went with 239ci power units.
__________________
Alastair
Lincoln, UK.


Under Restoration:
1944 No2 MK2 Loyd Carrier - Tracked Towing
1944 Ford WOT6 Lorry


The Loyd on Facebook

Last edited by ajmac; 27-04-12 at 19:40.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-04-12, 21:18
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

Al. This has been argued about before, so I will post it again. See the opening pages from a British manual below.
I'd guess the British built MkII unversals and Mortar carriers at least with 239 cu.in. engines.

On the fan and waterpumps. I would suggest in the carrier situation, the h.p. required to drive the fan is probably higher than in any other Ford application of the time. The fan blade was special and it has to work hard to force air through a highly restricted flow path. Our carriers weigh in at about 4 ton and along with the design causing air flow dificulties, they also operate often at a low ground speed. As a result there would be virtually no air flow, that is not fan driven.
I personally wouldnt be trying to run without the twin belts.
The ford v8 by design is elsewhere described as a "hot" motor, because the exhaust gases have to flow through the block. couple that to an increased capacity motor (8ba,239 cu.in.) an exhaust system designed for a 65 h.p. v8 (a morris minor sized pipe)
As you go up in cu.in., the requirement for cooling increases.
Suggestion: Dont take shortcuts with your cooling system.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg jan 30 10 048.jpg (44.3 KB, 15 views)
File Type: jpg jan 30 10 049.jpg (24.2 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg jan 30 10 047.jpg (46.7 KB, 13 views)
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....

Last edited by Lynn Eades; 27-04-12 at 21:25.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016