|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Smle
Would someone mind answering a brief question?
The Lee Enfield rifle, in particular. I was at the Imperial War Museum in London recently, unfortunately I didn't get to ask a curator this question about their exhibit. They had a rifle labeled SMLE, Short Magazine Lee Enfield. I had always believed SMLE meant Short Muzzle Lee Enfield. Could someone enlighten me. Cheers |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Perhaps it is because the name is somewhat out of context. The full name is "Rifle, short, magazine, Lee Enfield", indicating it is a shorter rifle than normal back in the day, it was magazine fed, and of the Lee Enfield pattern. It won't be because the magazione is short.....magazine fed rifles had become the norm, and a 10 round magazine was pretty much in line with the larger capacity mags of the day. A large magazine was somewhat frowned on as it could lead to wastage amongst the troops. As such a magazine cut-off was fitted. Until the order by the Sr NCO to open the cut-off, all shots were single.
A google of "Short Muzzle Lee Enfield" leads to nothing. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
When introduced in 1902 or thereabouts, the British army brass felt it was an awkward rifle 'too short to be accurate' and it would never succeed. Well, history sure proved them wrong. SMLE's are the prettiest rifles ever made (says me). Here's one with volley sights made by Birmingham Small Arms in 1908 and an Australian Lithgow made in 1915. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pshaaw....give me a LongBranch no4mk1*T any day of the week. Absolutely gorgeous.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
How about a 1944 Shirley instead? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I agree with Bruce et al: SMLE does indeed stand for 'Short, Magazine, Lee-Enfield'.
I seem to remember that 'magazine' denotes fed from not only a magazine, but one that is detachable. Lee is named for James Paris Lee, the designer of this particular bolt action, and Enfield after the Royal Small Arms Factory staff for improvements to Lee's design to make it what it is: a solid, fast, rear-locking, bolt action. I've had both a No4 Mk1* T and a No.1 Mk3* HT with the Patt 1918 'scope, and thought the latter was a far far nicer rifle to shoot. Never was able to procure a No.3 Mk.1 (T), but shot with one a couple of times: another nice rifle, but the SMLE was my favourite of the scoped .303 rifles. However, the nicest .303 I ever owned and fired was a 1915 Enfield manufactured No.1 Mk3*. It had a walnut stock that was much slimmer with much more 'shape' than the Australian coachwood-stocked rifles I had. My 'alfpenny's wurf... Mike |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Smle
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
But the best shooter (though one who's looks need to grow on you) has to be a Canadian Model 1910 Ross. Once you get over that whole "the bolt could blow back in your face" thing it's a dream to shoot. Pull the trigger, settle in, aim, adjust and 'plink', right in the bulls eye. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
There is a large museum in Qld that I won't name (to save them embarassment) that you need to take their exhibit captions with a 25lb bag of salt. Some howlers include a .310 Martini Cadet with clearly displayed manufacturing date of 1911 on it, with an interpretive panel next to it explaining that these rifles were taken to the Boer War by Australians because the .310 cartridge had better range than the .303 used by the British. And then there is the 1911A1 Colt pistol they have in "38mm Calibre". When I asked a museum volunteer to elaborate on these (and several others!!) interesting points, I was told that there are many interesting facts in military history that are not widely known by the public, and that is why museums such as this one were important. Would I care to leave a donation in the cash box by the door to enable them to continue their important work? My reply: "Would I????"
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
There are lots of museums and displays with similar 'problems' (including the AWM), Tony, and I've found a range of attitudes if you try and suggest a review.
The CWM has a woeful display of how an 18pdr shrapnel round works, plus a couple of 'positional' mix ups with display captions, but having written to the director suggesting changes, my letter was answered with a big fat nothing, and the last time I visited, the misleading display remains the same. Oh well. Mike (This if probably getting off this thread's topic, of course: maybe it deserves a different thread: 'Display Blunders I have Seen'??) |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Say goodbye to your wrist when you pull the trigger on that thing!
__________________
1942 International K5 3-ton truck ARN 43362 1940 Holden-bodied Chevrolet staff-car 1941 Holden-bodied Chevrolet staff car |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Nos smle
__________________
1940 cab 11 C8 1940 Morris-Commercial PU 1941 Morris-Commercial CS8 1940 Chev. 15cwt GS Van ( Aust.) 1942-45 Jeep salad |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Enfield Unwrapping
That youtube video reminds me of an Egyptian mummy unwrapping that was a common party theme by the wealthy during the Victorian era. I know there are many out there who disagree, but from my perspective, this video is just as thoughtless and shortsighted as there cannot be many NOS SMLEs still in their original wrapping. In their defence, at least the Victorians had little idea of what they were going to find when they unwrapped their bundle; whereas in this case the label was pretty clear.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
2) I expect a purist might say that, while a No.4 is shorter than a Long Lee, it isn't technically a 'Short, Magazine, Lee Enfield. 3) All those Victorians who morbidly meddled with mummies are now cursed along with their descendant's forever. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OZ SMLE (that's code for those who need to know) | Bruce Parker (RIP) | WW2 Military History & Equipment | 2 | 21-10-09 05:02 |
Is this an SMLE Sighting stand? | jagjetta | WW2 Military History & Equipment | 9 | 24-04-08 02:47 |