![]() |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I spotted this in a Chev manual and I learnt a new Chev idiosyncrasy
Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bonjour Mike....
....would you have a nice picture of the valve cover on the original 216..... from that book of yours???? I have these engines yet to be identified that maybe 216 or bigger..... the valve covers are mounted by 2 central studs/nuts combination ... BUT.. they have these tiny slits about 1/8 of an inch high by 1 inch wide...and about four of them. Some kind of opening that probably replaces the breather caps of later Chev 6...... It does not seem to be a good way to protect the innards of an engine but in 1940 ??? Eventually I will get down to scrapping the cooked grease deposit and find serial numbers and casting numbers for David H. Your help is appreciated. Bob C.
__________________
Bob Carriere....B.T.B C15a Cab 11 Hammond, Ontario Canada |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Most of the civilian 216's had the valve covers with the little slits. So did the early 235's. I'd never seen a 216 without the slits until I got a military one.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With a little more experience and having talked to a bunch of CMPers.... it would seem that the early military 216 used the available civy covers with the slits.... as soon as some sort of breather tube/cap was intalled the covers were no longer punched out for the slits. A variety of breather tubes/caps followed .... some original some which were added as extension to facilitate maintenance by non military owners.
Take care and thanks for sharing the info....
__________________
Bob Carriere....B.T.B C15a Cab 11 Hammond, Ontario Canada |
![]() |
|
|