View Single Post
  #22  
Old 21-03-21, 05:09
Colin Alford Colin Alford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob love View Post
Note that the shortened Cdn slings have a D ring on the end where the Adjustable ones have an oval ring. Perhaps this is the reason they cut off the stitched portion at that end in order to replace it with a D ring.
Rob,

My interpretation is that these short slings are indeed the first type “BE 8574”, and that the Canadian examples that we are discussing are as originally produced (not shortened).

My interpretation is that the D ring is correct for the first type slings, but this was changed to an oval ring for the Mk II slings.

Every image that I have found of a non-adjustable sling (both British, and Canadian) show a D ring, whereas the adjustable slings (both British, and Canadian) have the oval rings.

See these links for non-adjustable slings with D-rings:
Scroll down past the manuals, a Z.L.&T Ltd (no apparent date), and a closeup on a Z.L.&T Ltd 1942:
http://www.machinegunboards.com/foru...howtopic=10754

No apparent makers mark (but likely British due to stitched rather than riveted construction):
https://www.ima-usa.com/products/ori...18801712005189

A British M.E. Co. 1942:
https://dbgmilitaria.co.uk/shop/inde...oducts_id=5921

Scroll down to post number 63, another Z.L.&T. Ltd 1942:
https://www.cdnmilitarycollectors.co...-with-pictures

A British M.E. Co. (Unknown date):
https://militaria.co.uk/product/brit...justable-type/

The other piece of evidence is the illustration in the 1942 parts list which shows a D-ring.
Attached Thumbnails
07CD6D7E-FA3D-4B8D-99D5-A7B943C7F4C6.jpeg  

Last edited by Colin Alford; 21-03-21 at 06:36. Reason: Added another link
Reply With Quote