View Single Post
  #16  
Old 09-02-18, 17:27
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,365
Default

Thanks Lang and Tony,

Two great videos.

I liked the positive spin regarding the body re-design from the standard 3 ton - the real reason was that the prototype didn't meet the Army spec of a 3 ton carrying capacity, so (1) reduce the body weight to increase the carrying capacity and (2) change the army spec from a 3 ton truck to a 2 1/2 ton truck.

Mike
Reply With Quote