View Single Post
  #20  
Old 06-07-16, 10:31
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx42 View Post
Here is a photo of my new 9:00x16 tyres next to a slightly worn 9:25x16 tyre off my Lynx. You can see the 9:00 is taller and also narrower than the 9:25 tyre.
The new 9:00x16 tyres did drop onto the Lynx rims very easily.

Regards Rick.
It's not equivalent to compare modern production tyres with wartime production. By far, the bulk of modern 9.00-16 tyres are made to different cross section shapes to WW2 tyres, and virtually all are of the "American" or 5 degree bead seat design.

I do have 2 WW2 Canadian 9.25 tyres and the carcass size is the same as Canadian and English 9.00-16 tyres I have. However, both 9.25s are from different manufacturers and while the tyre widths are the same, the tread widths are different

I also have two near-new Australian made 7.50-16 bar tread tyres (from Land Rovers) which are over an inch in difference in diameter. The point I am trying to make is that tyre sizes are indicative or nominal, and are intended to provide more information than simply the physical dimensions.
Attached Thumbnails
IMG_1437.JPG   IMG_1439.JPG   IMG_1438.JPG   IMG_1440.JPG  
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote