Thread: owners MLVW
View Single Post
  #5  
Old 25-11-09, 03:01
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

I think where the single master cylinder system problem comes into play is that the MLVW was built in 82/ 83, at which time DOT standards were to have dual systems. The DND must have been exempt from that rule at the time, as we are with so many of the specialised vehicles. Technically, the MLVW should not pass a safety because it does not have a brake system that meets the standards of the year it was built in. Lighting will also be an issue since it does not meet SAE standards of the time, although there is lighting now available which will upgrade the older non-SAE approved mil lighting. Reflectors are also a tad on the skimpy side for a truck the size of the MLVW. The wipers and defroster would likely not meet the modern specs, but can be easily upgraded.

If you recall, the Iltis were also sold in a similar way at first. They were not certified by DOT, and there were shortcomings with the lighting systems on them compared to the required standards for the period they were built.
Reply With Quote