D-Day Uniforms
Can the statement about the uniforms and equipment for the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division being issued new kit for the Normandy invasion be supported with primary source documentation? I do know that certain specific new 'invasion related' kit such as Mk III Helmets, Boots, Assault Jerkins and Lightweight Respirators were issued for the invasion, but to completely re-equip the whole division with clothing is new to me. I was at the event that was held by Bill Gregg and yes the vehicles were replaced because for the most part after several years of wear, tear, exercises and multiple drivers, the B vehicles at least were pretty clapped out. As well, the newer B vehicles were No. 13 cabs and it only makes sense to start the campaign with new B vehicles. In the case of the A vehicles, many were already new and they do not recieve the heavy useage that B vehicles do so I would doubt that they would all get replaced, although I am not sure what was done with the Universal Carriers.
Getting back to weapons, to be frank, it would not make sense to replace all of the small arms just for the sake of newness when they do not wear out as fast as mechanical transport. You also have to look at the 'big picture' as the cost in time and material to manufacture items and then ship them to the UK would mean that just replacing things to have new, in the case of uniforms and equipment, would not necessarily make sense. Anyway, if the uniform statement can be supported with documentation, then fine.
|