View Single Post
  #6  
Old 31-07-08, 00:22
Ralph Volkert Ralph Volkert is offline
Communications Field tech
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Latchford, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 142
Default

Hey Jordon

Sometimes this hobby gives me a headache!!!

It was my understanding that all canadian carriers were CT XXXX and that in the beginning of production not all were actually hull marked CT and some were only marked with a T number. But that they would still have been a "CT"

My list does have a bias in that I have tried to only post canadian carriers. Hence the CT designations. IF not ALL Canadian carriers were marked CT as they left the factory, was there a rhyme or reason for the variance?

I thought T designations were normally British and Australian carriers. Jordon could you confirm if the 2 carriers you mention were canadian?

If anyone can shed some light....
(Type slowly please!)
__________________
Ralph Volkert

UC 2Mk I*
Upper Hull: CB 8075
Lower Hull: 8105
S/N: 9075
Date: Jun(est) 42
contract #: CDLV 213

1946 Willys Jeep
1974 Plymouth Road Runner
1987 Trans Am
Reply With Quote