![]() |
Rocket propelled UC?
1 Attachment(s)
I have found two sequential photos of what appears to be a test of using rockets to lift? move? whatever? a Universal carrier. To what end, I can only imagine. As you can see from the pics, the test was a failure, I presume, resulting in the UC flipping over. Evident in the pictures are what appears to be 6 rockets, three per side with blast deflectors below each of the rockets. To what end these tests were done is beyond my ken. Has anyone see such a thing before?
|
and the result:
1 Attachment(s)
next pic
|
sapper
i have seen lots of photos with rockets on the UC. most of the photos were for the self recovery system from what i have uncovered. there was a system to help get the carrier unstuck from mud or soft sand. the rockets would lift the carrier body and give the tracks a chance to move the carrier. dont know if any were ever used in the real world. |
Rockets
Perhaps we should send these images to Mythbusters. Who's going to volunteer their carrier? :devil:
|
Re: Rockets
Quote:
|
you suck
i will tell you that im at a steady 225!!!! :cheers: and if we take the stripped down carrier that would be only about 1.5 tons so it would be about 4 bottles. i think you need to get a JSF motor and put it on your CMP they get 40,000 LB of thrust and they are in FT worth so you could just go and have one loaded up. you going to OK on the 26th? dave |
This sounds like something of a Wiley Coyote and Roadrunner episode! The rockets are probably made by ACME.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
And just so we don't get zinged for using this forum as a message board, here's a great picture of a UC towing a 6 pdr AT gun. Something you should be able to emulate soon. :salute: |
yep wash at taaaa
i have the MK II and the 6lb.... but im like just about everyone els, missing the rear tow hook atachment. may have it fixed soon. |
Details for photo
Salut Sappeur!
Happy New year and all that social blather... do you have any details on that photo? Looks like the unit number is 46 which is the ATk Regt in an Inf Div. Ubique! Mike |
Re: Rocket propelled UC?
Quote:
The two photos you have come across are the before and after photos of a test of a "gap-jumping tank", that was carried out by the British Specialized Armour Development Establishment (SADE). The concept was, the gap-jumping tank was designed to fly across impassable obstacles. The object was to lift the tank bodily into the air by means of rockets. This device was tested first on a carrier (your two photos) and subsequently on a turretless Valentine. The device itself consisted of a battery of rockets which were fired together to catapult the tank through the air. There was no problems encountered in lifting the vehicle off the ground, the difficulty was getting it to land right side up. It was never clear what happened to the vehicle in the air since it was invisible in a cloud of smoke, but despite a series of tests the stability issue was never resolved. The Specialized Armour Development Establishment (later the Specialized Armour Establishment (SAE)), was an immediate post-war organization (1945) that with War Office approval, was established by General Sir P.C.S. Hobart. It was located at Woodbridge, Suffolk, with an amphibious wing at Gosport, Hampshire. SADE's (and later SAE's) task was to improve existing equipment and develop new ideas. This establishment was closed in 1951. Cheers |
Re: Details for photo
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:15. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016