MLU FORUM

MLU FORUM (http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/index.php)
-   The Softskin Forum (http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Gun tractor pic (http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/showthread.php?t=32018)

Mike Kelly 16-02-21 09:12

Gun tractor pic
 
2 Attachment(s)
One of the car bodies for the Gun Tractor receiving finishing treatment prior to mounting

Attachment 120053
https://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/Sear...aspx?B=5394417


Strafing damage

Attachment 120054
https://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/Sear...aspx?B=5702106

David Herbert 16-02-21 10:37

The Gun tractor body in the photo above is for a Karrier KT4. These were supplied to the Indian Army via the British government's India Office.
The bodies were built by BLSP in Slough, England. The sandbags in the background are because the factory was well inside the area that could be bombed.

Surveyor Samuel's car looks like it could be mended, it only has little holes in it !

David

Mike Cecil 16-02-21 18:03

Car ID?
 
Does anyone recognize the little perforated roadster's make and model?

The car carries the unit sign of the Northern Territory Public Works Department, part of the Commonwealth Department of the Interior (hence the D of I code on the image). The Unit sign was a yellow square with black numerals.

Mike

Hanno Spoelstra 16-02-21 18:04

Karrier KT-4
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by David Herbert (Post 276835)
The Gun tractor body in the photo above is for a Karrier KT4. These were supplied to the Indian Army via the British government's India Office.
The bodies were built by BLSP in Slough, England. The sandbags in the background are because the factory was well inside the area that could be bombed.

Great pic of a rare tractor. This is what it looked like once completed:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hanno Spoelstra (Post 117008)
See http://miliblog.co.uk/?cat=48&nggpage=6 for a good picture of the Karrier KT-4 FAT
Attachment 120055


Bruce Parker (RIP) 17-02-21 01:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hanno Spoelstra (Post 276839)
Great pic of a rare tractor. This is what it looked like once completed:

Oh my that's ugly, beautifully ugly!!

Mike Kelly 17-02-21 09:31

Austin 7
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Cecil (Post 276838)
Does anyone recognize the little perforated roadster's make and model?

The car carries the unit sign of the Northern Territory Public Works Department, part of the Commonwealth Department of the Interior (hence the D of I code on the image). The Unit sign was a yellow square with black numerals.

Mike

My initial thought was a Austin 7. Somebody else agrees

Quote:

Alexander Scott
The wheels are three stud Austin 7 type with elongated holes for the locators. Nothing else really had wheels like that so I’d say it’s a coach built or special body on an Austin 7 chassis. The body isn’t really like anything that was sold ex works by Austin in UK as far as I can remember. Perhaps the body is an Aussie built type?


Mike Cecil 17-02-21 17:24

Thanks Mike. Thought it had to be something like that.


Mike

Lynn Eades 17-02-21 19:12

I believe Morris's (z?) came to N.Z. post war as cab/chassis (complete front with windscreen, build the rest your self) My guess is that the Austin Seven was the same?
I wonder how Surveyor Sam fared?

Lang 18-02-21 22:00

1 Attachment(s)
I think it is much too big and heavy for an Austin 7. It looks quite a substantial vehicle with heavy wheels.

Something along these lines. This is an English Morris 10 Roadster and the Australian bodied vehicle would have had differences including the type of wheels fitted.

Tony Smith 19-02-21 01:08

2 Attachment(s)
Lang, don't forget the unit sign is about 6" square! Gives a bit of scale.

The car does look like an Austin 7 Ruby, 1935-37 bodywork.

https://www.justcars.com.au/cars-for...by/JCMD5012151

Lang 19-02-21 01:20

Tony

I think the unit sign is much larger than 6 inches. That would make the wheels about 12 inches - Mini Moke size.

Hood bows are too heavy for an Austin 7 as well and I don't think an Austin 7 could carry a full size rear seat like that. It certainly is English and looks about the 1935/6 period. Pretty sure the hubcap says "12" if that is the case most likely a Morris 12.

I will keep looking.

Mike Cecil 19-02-21 03:24

Unit sign is more likely about 8 inches square, though the application on Govt (non-military) vehicles seems to vary. If so, that would make the wheels about 16 inches.

Mike

Lang 19-02-21 04:35

1 Attachment(s)
Another option is an Austin 12 with the same caveat about Australian bodies and wheel types.

Hanno Spoelstra 23-07-23 12:23

Karrier KT4
 
4 Attachment(s)
More Karrier KT4 photos

Attachment 135181

Attachment 135182

Attachment 135183

Attachment 135184

Richard Farrant 23-07-23 14:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lang (Post 276887)
Hood bows are too heavy for an Austin 7 as well and I don't think an Austin 7 could carry a full size rear seat like that. It certainly is English and looks about the 1935/6 period. Pretty sure the hubcap says "12" if that is the case most likely a Morris 12.

I will keep looking.

Only just seen this thread, re. the surveyor's car, I first thought the hub cap had 12 on it, but on a closer look, I think it is the 'W' emblem of Wolseley.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:18.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016